The World Economy 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118512968.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trading Partners, Traded Products and Firm Performances of China's ExporterImporters: Does Processing Trade Make a Difference?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described in Table , After matching the product‐level trade data and firm‐level production data, the remaining observations account for nearly 15 percent of the original firm‐level production dataset yearly, and about 25 percent of the original product‐level trade dataset, and more than half in terms of export value. By way of comparison, our matching success rate is highly comparable to that in other studies that use the same datasets, such as Wang and Yu (), Ge et al . () and Yu ().…”
Section: Data and Variable Definitionssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described in Table , After matching the product‐level trade data and firm‐level production data, the remaining observations account for nearly 15 percent of the original firm‐level production dataset yearly, and about 25 percent of the original product‐level trade dataset, and more than half in terms of export value. By way of comparison, our matching success rate is highly comparable to that in other studies that use the same datasets, such as Wang and Yu (), Ge et al . () and Yu ().…”
Section: Data and Variable Definitionssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As described in Table 1, After matching the product-level trade data and firm-level production data, the remaining observations account for nearly 15 percent of the original firm-level production dataset yearly, and about 25 percent of the original product-level trade dataset, and more than half in terms of export value. By way of comparison, our matching success rate is highly comparable to that in other studies that use the same datasets, such as Wang and Yu (2012), Ge et al (2011) andYu (2014). In the baseline estimation, we only use matched firms appearing each year, that is exporting every year (around 5,404 firms), but the results are not significantly changed after including the incidental exporters, which is done in our robustness check.…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We check the consistency of our matches using phone numbers and location-specific information. 15 Our matching algorithm and results are very similar to those in Manova and Yu (2011) and Wang and Yu (2012) and capture approximately two-thirds of the exporters in the manufacturing data set. We conduct a number of tests to study the composition of exports across products and firms in both the matched sample and the firm-level data.…”
Section: The Matching Processmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Hence, we merge two databases using 'firm name' and year. The merged dataset comprises 80,375 unique manufacturing export firms, similar in number to that used by Wang and Yu (2012). Note, the CASIF records if the firm exports, and we can match as high as 55% of these to CCTS; but there is a concern that the resulting matched records may be biased towards larger firms, those in certain industries, or certain (eastern seaboard) provinces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%