2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10030343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trading Natural Riparian Forests for Urban Shelterbelt Plantations—A Sustainability Assessment of the Kökyar Protection Forest in NW China

Abstract: Cities at the fringe of the Taklimakan desert in NW China are prone to dust and sand storms with serious consequences for human well-being. The Kökyar Protection Forest was established in the 1980s as an ecological engineering project with the intent of protecting the city of Aksu, NW China, from these impacts. It is designed as a combination of poplar shelterbelts and orchards, irrigated by river water from the Aksu River, the main tributary of the Tarim River. Prevalent literature describes it as an afforest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may arise in situations where there are benefits to project participants but costs to non‐participants or where a project benefits all members of a community locally but imposes costs to communities elsewhere (Chausson et al, 2020). For example, an urban shelterbelt in China protects city‐dwellers from dust storms, but Uighur communities downstream suffer because the heavy irrigation demand of the shelterbelt is drying out the native riparian forests on which they depend (Missall et al, 2018).…”
Section: Potential Pitfalls Of Nature‐based Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may arise in situations where there are benefits to project participants but costs to non‐participants or where a project benefits all members of a community locally but imposes costs to communities elsewhere (Chausson et al, 2020). For example, an urban shelterbelt in China protects city‐dwellers from dust storms, but Uighur communities downstream suffer because the heavy irrigation demand of the shelterbelt is drying out the native riparian forests on which they depend (Missall et al, 2018).…”
Section: Potential Pitfalls Of Nature‐based Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, if non‐native tree plantations replace intact native ecosystems such as ancient grasslands, peatlands or woodlands, the outcomes for biodiversity will be poor (Balthazar et al, 2015; Barlow et al, 2007; Bond, 2016; Bremer & Farley, 2010; Stephens & Wagner, 2007). Native biodiversity can also suffer if exotic species used in plantations become invasive (García‐Palacios et al, 2010), over‐dominant (Yu et al, 2012) or reduce water supplies (Missall et al, 2018).…”
Section: Potential Pitfalls Of Nature‐based Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these three, there were six negative climate impact outcomes overall with two being for timber production and two being for water availability. For example, plantations of non-native tree species in China established to protect towns from dust storms resulted in loss of native shrubland and over-abstraction of water for irrigation, leading to the loss of 8,000 ha of native forest downstream (Missall et al, 2018). Supplementary Table S4 provides further specific examples of associations between ecosystem health and adaptation outcomes; Supplementary Table S5 gives more details on the types and directions of adaptation outcomes for interventions in this study.…”
Section: Do Outcomes Vary With the Type Of The Nature-based Intervent...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two articles [18,19] look at the use of tree shelterbelts vs. natural riparian forests in urban areas and tree shelterbelts to improve water management. Missall et al [18] perform a sustainability assessment of the Kökyar Protection Forest in NW China (Tarim River Basin). This area is prone to dust and sand storms with detrimental effects on human health.…”
Section: Tree Shelterbelts To Improve Water Management and Sustainabi...mentioning
confidence: 99%