1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04567.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trading Mechanisms and Stock Returns: An Empirical Investigation

Abstract: This paper examines the effects of the mechanism by which securities are traded on their price behavior. We compare the behavior of open‐to‐open and close‐to‐close returns on NYSE stocks, given the differences in execution methods applied in the opening and closing transactions. Opening returns are found to exhibit greater dispersion, greater deviations from normality and a more negative and significant autocorrelation pattern than closing returns. We study the effects of the bid‐ask spread and the price‐adjus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
153
2
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 544 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(69 reference statements)
6
153
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Market microstructure noise has many sources, including the discreteness of the price (see Harris, 1990Harris, , 1991, and properties of the trading mechanism, as in Black (1976) and Amihud and Mendelson (1987). For additional references to this literature, see O'Hara (1995), Madhavan (2000), Hasbrouck (2004), and Biais et al (2005).…”
Section: The Effects Of Microstructure Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Market microstructure noise has many sources, including the discreteness of the price (see Harris, 1990Harris, , 1991, and properties of the trading mechanism, as in Black (1976) and Amihud and Mendelson (1987). For additional references to this literature, see O'Hara (1995), Madhavan (2000), Hasbrouck (2004), and Biais et al (2005).…”
Section: The Effects Of Microstructure Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out in the introduction, three different endogenous variables are considered: true asset 22 It has been well documented that overnight returns differ substantially from intraday returns Mendelson, 1987 andWhaley, 1990). Note: For the characteristics of relative spread, differences in time and accumulated volume, it is shown the percentage changes, averaged across all BTs, according to the following statistic:…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structure has not been typically taken into account by a variety of measures used in the past. For example, variance-ratio measures, allow positive covariances to offset negative covariances (see, for example, Amihud and Mendelson (1987) or Hasbrouck and Schwartz (1988)). Our measure also encompasses the information content of the zero-return measures (introduced in Lesmond, Ogden, and Trzcinka (1999) (LOT) and further refined by Bekaert, Harvey and Lundblatt (2007) to incorporate the length of non-trading interval).…”
Section: B Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%