2016
DOI: 10.1111/amet.12267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trading in broken things: Gendered performances and spatial practices in a northern Vietnamese rural‐urban waste economy

Abstract: Through their deeply gendered performative and place‐making practices, migrant waste traders take part in regenerating and revaluing urban space in Hanoi, Vietnam. Ethnographic research in the city and in their native rural district suggests that these practices are simultaneously strategic and contingent on the waste traders’ gender and class positions. This positioning is defined by their marginalization as rural migrants and the social ambiguity of waste, which they creatively use for their own purposes. Al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this light, the transformation of cities like Patna is not simply an extension of the urban nor a rupture of its fabric. Tracing these entanglements resonates with the work of scholars who have examined the messy boundaries between rural and urban in Asia (Bach ; Harms ; Nguyen ). Drawing on these approaches, I foreground the ways that rural people do not just inhabit the city but also actively produce it, strategically drawing upon distinctively rural materials and forms of sociality to give life to a putatively urban environment.…”
Section: Urban Migrationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In this light, the transformation of cities like Patna is not simply an extension of the urban nor a rupture of its fabric. Tracing these entanglements resonates with the work of scholars who have examined the messy boundaries between rural and urban in Asia (Bach ; Harms ; Nguyen ). Drawing on these approaches, I foreground the ways that rural people do not just inhabit the city but also actively produce it, strategically drawing upon distinctively rural materials and forms of sociality to give life to a putatively urban environment.…”
Section: Urban Migrationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Secondhand consumption practice was stigmatized and tied to xenophobic and classist stereotypes (Hansen and Le Zotte ) that regarded the people who work with and reuse discards with the same disgust and disdain as waste and its contaminated, polluting properties (Gill ; Gregson et al ; Reno ). It is true that we find ethnographic evidence of strong reuse practices in resource‐strapped communities (Nguyen ; Trang ) and among stigmatized people, including garbage pickers (Medina ; Millar 2008) and sanitation workers (Nagle ). However, we argue, consistent with our interest in alternative economic logics, that the stigma of reuse goes beyond classism and can also be attributed to dominant economic logics that continue to valorize production as the primary genesis of value.…”
Section: Background and Literature Review: Meaning Motive And Valuementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, participation in alternative, secondhand markets has come to be understood variously as resistance to consumer culture, waste, and the destructive traits of modernity (Albinsson and Perera ; Crocker and Chiveralls ; Vaughan, Cook, and Trawick ); a strategy for “saving” (Herrmann ); a creative expression of care (Appelgren ); identity performance (Crewe and Gregson ); and economic necessity (Isenhour and Reno ; Nguyen ). These research engagements make it clear that reuse practices are shaped by a wide variety of motivators that are highly situational (Bowser et al ) and depend on the product category and form of reuse (Gregson and Crewe ; Stokes et al ).…”
Section: Background and Literature Review: Meaning Motive And Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, numerous ethnographies have already illustrated the deeply relational, situated and cultural entanglements implied in the determination of 'resource' 'value' and 'waste' among a wide variety of communities for whom the concept of circular economy is considered common sense. From ethnographies featuring innovative reuse among resource-strapped communities (Nguyen, 2016) and garbage pickers on the margins of Brazilian society (Millar, 2018) to sanitary workers in New York City (Nagle, 2014), or among connoisseurs of thrift shops and vintage goods (Appelgren and Bohlin, 2015;Isenhour, 2012), these studies have long demonstrated the not-so-novel concept of informal circular economies in action.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%