2013
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tradeoffs in microbial carbon allocation may mediate soil carbon storage in future climates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher CUE can augment soil C storage by increasing the amount of C retained in the soil, whereas higher biomass may increase overall carbon processing. Here, we observed that increases in the amount or C content of the microbial biomass enhanced soil C loss in the ramp treatment, probably by increasing overall enzyme production (Allison et al, 2010;Kivlin et al, 2013;Manzoni et al, 2012). Alternatively, nutrient limitation in microbial biomass owing to the greater incorporation of C in biomass in the ramp treatment could also increase C loss through overflow respiration (Franklin, Hall, Kaiser, Battin, & Richter, 2011;Russell & Cook, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher CUE can augment soil C storage by increasing the amount of C retained in the soil, whereas higher biomass may increase overall carbon processing. Here, we observed that increases in the amount or C content of the microbial biomass enhanced soil C loss in the ramp treatment, probably by increasing overall enzyme production (Allison et al, 2010;Kivlin et al, 2013;Manzoni et al, 2012). Alternatively, nutrient limitation in microbial biomass owing to the greater incorporation of C in biomass in the ramp treatment could also increase C loss through overflow respiration (Franklin, Hall, Kaiser, Battin, & Richter, 2011;Russell & Cook, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Soil organic C decomposition, CUE and CUE acclimation can create feedbacks loops. For example, lower CUE may lead to a decline in microbial biomass and degradative enzymes and curbing of soil C losses under warming (Allison et al, 2010;Kivlin, Waring, Averill, & Hawkes, 2013;Schimel, 2013). Thus, microbial adaptation could accelerate soil C loss by counteracting the decline in microbial biomass from an upward adjustment in CUE (i.e., acclimation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the decrease in microbial biomass‐N during drought in permanent intensive grasslands was not associated with a change in soil N processes, which remained stable (Figure ). This suggests that the resistant part of microbial communities maintained N‐cycling levels through higher activity per unit of biomass (selection of oligotrophic microbes during drought) or that slow enzymes turnover in dry conditions maintained enzyme activity after the death of their producers (Kivlin, Waring, Averill, & Hawkes, ; Steinweg, Dukes, & Wallenstein, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent evidence showing that higher microbial growth rate and efficiency can increase C storage in agricultural soils (Kallenbach et al, 2015) and in grassland soils (Poeplau et al, 2019), there still remains great uncertainty regarding how and in which directions these traits will impact SOC pools (Anthony et al, 2020;Malik et al, 2020). For example, higher microbial growth efficiency can augment SOC storage by increasing the amount of C from soil microbial biomass and ultimately necromass, while increased microbial biomass C may also enhance production of Cdegrading enzymes leading to decreased soil C stocks (Kivlin et al, 2013). The impacts of microbial physiological traits on SOC dynamics can also vary at multiple ecological scales (Geyer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Microbial Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%