1989
DOI: 10.1080/0305498890150102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tradeoffs in Examination Policies: an international comparative perspective1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the role of these examinations is being challenged and many institutions now provide alternative routes of entry, especially for adults. In the post-war period, Japan moved from a national system of higher education selection on the basis of a nationwide standardized examination, to a variety of selection methods, and in 1976 to the present two stage system which was introduced in order to improve the control by colleges and universities over the make-up of their entering classes (Noah and Eckstein 1989). The first stage, the Joint First Stage Achievement Test, is retrospective and seeks to test mastery of the secondary school curriculum; the second stage, set and marked by each institution separately, tries to forecast a candidate's potential fit with the demands of the future course of study.…”
Section: Recent Trends In Sdection and Admissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the role of these examinations is being challenged and many institutions now provide alternative routes of entry, especially for adults. In the post-war period, Japan moved from a national system of higher education selection on the basis of a nationwide standardized examination, to a variety of selection methods, and in 1976 to the present two stage system which was introduced in order to improve the control by colleges and universities over the make-up of their entering classes (Noah and Eckstein 1989). The first stage, the Joint First Stage Achievement Test, is retrospective and seeks to test mastery of the secondary school curriculum; the second stage, set and marked by each institution separately, tries to forecast a candidate's potential fit with the demands of the future course of study.…”
Section: Recent Trends In Sdection and Admissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some do not recognize the process; some do not want to face up to the process; some do not believe they can or should do anything about the process; and some devote their entire careers to countering the process. In the case of systems for which high stakes examinations serve the role of sorting students and deciding who is eligible for accessing the next level of education, teachers normally respond by dealing the best they feel they can (that is, to ensure incentivized success) with the policy hand they are dealt (e.g., Gould 1981;Noah and Eckstein 1989). Thus, Huining's best high school, whose primary goal was to educate students who would score high on the CEE, not only fully endorsed the activities of categorizing and defining a most likely group of students for success but also explicitly differentiated likely "winners and losers" as early as one year before the examination.…”
Section: Second Encounter: "Help Only Those Who Are Most Promising"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examinations and records of achievement are being adapted accordingly in many countries. (For a summary review, including Britain, France, Germany, Soviet Union and Sweden, see Noah and Eckstein, 1989.) The search is for "a systemically valid test" (Frederiksen and Collins, 1989) one which "induces in the educational system curricular and instructional changes that foster the development of the cognitive skills that the test is designcd to measure" (p. 27).…”
Section: Formal Operational Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%