Trade Unions, Wage Formation and Macroeconomic Stability 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-08596-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade Unions, Wage Formation and Macroeconomic Stability—An Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, for the wage-maximization objective to be effective, the union must monopolise the entire industry: all the firms will then be able to increase their output prices and still stay in competition. Oswald concurs that the unilateral setting of wages by a union, has a devastating effect on employment and output prices (Calmfors and Horn, 1986;Calmfors and Driffill, 1988;Carlin and Soskice, 1990) . Inevitably, therefore, the union has no choice but to try to increase its market power by controlling the entire labour supply within a given industry.…”
Section: Wage Settlements and Macro -Economic Consequences: A Theoretmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, for the wage-maximization objective to be effective, the union must monopolise the entire industry: all the firms will then be able to increase their output prices and still stay in competition. Oswald concurs that the unilateral setting of wages by a union, has a devastating effect on employment and output prices (Calmfors and Horn, 1986;Calmfors and Driffill, 1988;Carlin and Soskice, 1990) . Inevitably, therefore, the union has no choice but to try to increase its market power by controlling the entire labour supply within a given industry.…”
Section: Wage Settlements and Macro -Economic Consequences: A Theoretmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained in Figure 1, the union determined wageemployment solution at point Eo is not Pareto-efficient because there is scope for both the union and the firm to improve their welfare by agreeing on a lower wage rate and higher employment; the resulting efficient bargains are likely to be negotiated on the contract curve CC', which is off the labour demand schedule, except at point C. But, on the contract curve the solution point is indeterminate, in the sense that there exists a multitude of outcomes and that a unique solution cannot be obtained unless additional conditions are introduced. Examples are generalised Nash solutions (unions and firms share the rents from their joint activities in relation to their relative bargaining strengths), fair-share rules (the shares of value added that should accrue to capitalists and labour, respectively, are held constant), and minimum profit conditions (trade unions push wages up to the point before which firms are closed down, see Calmfors, 1986; McDonald and Solow, 1981).…”
Section: N Wage Determination Through the Arbitration Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important questions are whether the non~ooperative structure of the interaction between the players Ieads to inefficiencies, in what sense the outcome is satisfactory seen from the government's point of view, and how the outcome is aífected by the fact that the interaction takes place repeatedly. (The papers brought together in Calmfors and Horn (1986), for example, discuss a number of these issues).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calmfors and Horn (1985) argued that the tendency of governments to take up labour market slack in recessions may, through its effect on union wage setting, have been one cause of stagflation in Sweden and other corporatist and semi~orporatist European countries in the 1960's and 1970's. Driffill (1984, 1985, using a similar model, argued that stabilization policy in the face of random shocks to the eeonomy may have made unions ]ess concerned about the unemployment consequences of high real wages, leading to a higher mean level, although to a lower variance, of unemployment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%