This is one of the seven accepted papers among 76 papers that were submitted to the solicitation by Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies in the special "Call-for-Papers" event in 2008.
AbstractThis study examines the impact of trade characteristics on stock return volatility. Using a sample of transaction data from the Australian Stock Exchange, the trading frequency of medium sized trades is found to have the greatest impact on stock return volatility. The result lends support to the stealth trading hypothesis (Barclay and Warner, 1993). After controlling for trading frequency, the average trade size is found to have little explanatory power on price volatility. Stock return volatility is more sensitive to buyer-initiated trades than seller-initiated trades, especially so for buyer-initiated medium sized trades. This finding is consistent with the assertion that information effects are stronger for buys than for sells (Chan and Lakonishok, 1993).The relationship between stock return volatility and trading volume is of considerable interest to financial researchers. In a review of the literature in this area, Karpoff (1987) provides several reasons as to why the volatility-volume relation is important, namely: (1) it provides insights into the structure of financial markets;(2) it is important for event studies that use a combination of volatility and volume data from which to draw inferences; and (3) it is critical to the debate concerning the empirical distribution of speculative prices. The majority of empirical studies to date have found a positive contemporaneous relationship between trading volume and stock return volatility in equity markets (see Schwert, 1989;and Gallant, Rossi, and Tauchen, 1992), derivative markets (see Daigler and Wiley, 1999), foreign exchange markets (see Bjønnes, Rime and Solheim, 2003), and cross-related markets (see Antoniou and Holmes, 1995). Overall, the evidence suggests that trading volume-as a measure of information intensity-plays a role in affecting price volatility. As trading volume can be decomposed into trade size and trading frequency, the objective of this study is to empirically investigate the extent to which each component of trading volume affects stock return volatility on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). There are three motivations underlying this study. First, this study empirically tests the validity of two types of 'asymmetric information' models that provide different answers on the affect of trading frequency and/or trade size on stock return volatility. These models can be categorised into competitive models and strategic models. In competitive models (see Pfleiderer, 1984;Grundy and McNichols, 1989;Holthausen and Verrecchia, 1990; Kim and Verrecchia, 1991), informed traders prefer to trade a larger amount of a security at any given price than uninformed traders do. The competitive model implies that larger trade sizes may convey more information and will be associated with higher volatility. In strategic models (see Kyle, 1985, Admati andPfleider...