2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3092880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade Secrets and Innovation: Evidence from the 'Inevitable Disclosure' Doctrine

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study focuses on choice of appropriability mechanism, conditional on the success of R&D. In independent work focusing on the effect of trade secrets law on equity finance and disclosure respectively, Dass et al (2014) and Glaeser et al (2017) find that the UTSA was associated with less patenting. Contigiani et al (2016), Liu (2016), and Huang and Png (2017) also investigate the effect of trade secrets law on patenting. They find that the doctrine of inevitable disclosure is associated with more or less patenting, depending on samples and representation of the law.…”
Section: Png: Theory and Evidence From The Uniform Trade Secrets Actmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study focuses on choice of appropriability mechanism, conditional on the success of R&D. In independent work focusing on the effect of trade secrets law on equity finance and disclosure respectively, Dass et al (2014) and Glaeser et al (2017) find that the UTSA was associated with less patenting. Contigiani et al (2016), Liu (2016), and Huang and Png (2017) also investigate the effect of trade secrets law on patenting. They find that the doctrine of inevitable disclosure is associated with more or less patenting, depending on samples and representation of the law.…”
Section: Png: Theory and Evidence From The Uniform Trade Secrets Actmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This need not imply that the rejection of the IDD does not affect innovation. In fact, Contigiani, Hsu, and Barankay () show that the (citation‐weighted) patent count decreases following the rejection of the IDD. Taken together, these results suggest that, while companies maintain their R&D budgets, they are less effective in converting their R&D into successful patents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noncompetes are just one of many within‐industry mobility frictions. Others include trade secret protections (Png, ), the inevitable disclosure doctrine (Contigiani, Hsu, & Barankay, ; Png & Samila, ) , patent laws (Ganco, Ziedonis, & Agarwal, ), and restrictive covenants such as nondisclosure and nonsolicitation agreements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%