2017
DOI: 10.1101/184432
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade-off shapes diversity in eco-evolutionary dynamics

Abstract: We introduce an Interaction and Trade-off based Eco-Evolutionary Model (ITEEM), in which species are competing for resources in a well-mixed system, and their evolution in interaction trait space is subject to a life-history trade-off between replication rate and competitive ability.We demonstrate that the strength of the trade-off has a fundamental impact on eco-evolutionary dynamics, as it imposes four phases of diversity, including a sharp phase transition. Despite its minimalism, ITEEM produces without fur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to very high frequencies of mutator clones within populations 2 and 4, we do not present Muller plots for these populations. Muller plots were produced using the R package MullerPlot ( Farahpour et al. 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to very high frequencies of mutator clones within populations 2 and 4, we do not present Muller plots for these populations. Muller plots were produced using the R package MullerPlot ( Farahpour et al. 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequencies are recorded every generations over generations. The plot was produced with R-package MullerPlot ( Farahpour et al, 2016 ). ( b ) Distribution over trait space: Snapshot of distribution of strains and species in trait space after generations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite adaptive evolution in steady environments, deficient genomes evolved in a jack-of-all-trades-and-master-of-all manner, which was theoretically proposed as one of three mechanisms for specialism that is widespread in nature 50 , in comparison to the wild-type genome, which adopted a tradeoff mechanism, which was generally explained by constraints in phenotypic space 51,52 . In nature, the trade-off strategy might be more frequent and reasonable for costless adaptation and niche expansion during eco-evolution 2,53,54 . As both the genome and the environment participate in ecological evolution, the coordination among genetic richness, adaptiveness and niche broadness revealed a quantitative linkage of adaptive evolution to ecology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%