Abstract:Agricultural holdings select goals in various areas when setting their strategic objectives. Economic objectives tend to be viewed as strategic because of the requirement to maximise economic profit for the owners. Since there is significant interaction between agricultural holdings and the environment, it is also important to monitor the environmental aspects of farming. The article seeks to draw on unique multicriteria assessment to compare the compatibility of economic and environmental objectives at 1 189 … Show more
“…Policy makers can take into account the results of this study to find the areas where the sustainability rate should be increased and purposefully promote that by specific measures. On the other hand, it has been confirmed (Wrzaszcz 2014;Sulewski and Kloczko-Gajewska 2018;Špička et al 2020) that the agricultural dimensions have a relationship between themselves and can positively or negatively affect each other which should be taken into consideration. The future research could focus on modulation of the selected policy measures and its impact on the farm results and multidimensional evaluation.…”
The purpose of this paper is to examine the internal structure of Czech agricultural holdings based on a multicriteria evaluation of the five dimensions representing the main functions of agriculture including production, economic<br />factors, financial stability, environmental, and social and other factors. A cluster analysis was performed to identify two clusters of farms. The first cluster consists of smaller holdings that specialize in livestock production and achieve poorer financial results compared to the second cluster, which includes a larger share of large holdings that focus on crop production. The first cluster exhibited better performance as regards environmental protection and financial stability. In contrast, the second cluster achieved better scores regarding production and economic factors. However, an evaluation of all dimensions showed that the second cluster of farms obtained slightly better ratings (2.7% above the overall average) then the first cluster (3.1% below the overall average score). It is up to policy makers to decide which group of farmers, is more approaching the aim of the new agricultural policy. Policy makers can consider the results of this study to find the areas where the sustainability rate should be increased and purposefully promote that by specific measures to achieve balanced farming system.
“…Policy makers can take into account the results of this study to find the areas where the sustainability rate should be increased and purposefully promote that by specific measures. On the other hand, it has been confirmed (Wrzaszcz 2014;Sulewski and Kloczko-Gajewska 2018;Špička et al 2020) that the agricultural dimensions have a relationship between themselves and can positively or negatively affect each other which should be taken into consideration. The future research could focus on modulation of the selected policy measures and its impact on the farm results and multidimensional evaluation.…”
The purpose of this paper is to examine the internal structure of Czech agricultural holdings based on a multicriteria evaluation of the five dimensions representing the main functions of agriculture including production, economic<br />factors, financial stability, environmental, and social and other factors. A cluster analysis was performed to identify two clusters of farms. The first cluster consists of smaller holdings that specialize in livestock production and achieve poorer financial results compared to the second cluster, which includes a larger share of large holdings that focus on crop production. The first cluster exhibited better performance as regards environmental protection and financial stability. In contrast, the second cluster achieved better scores regarding production and economic factors. However, an evaluation of all dimensions showed that the second cluster of farms obtained slightly better ratings (2.7% above the overall average) then the first cluster (3.1% below the overall average score). It is up to policy makers to decide which group of farmers, is more approaching the aim of the new agricultural policy. Policy makers can consider the results of this study to find the areas where the sustainability rate should be increased and purposefully promote that by specific measures to achieve balanced farming system.
“…Different studies stress that larger units, and therefore those with more assets and income, have a better chance of having a positive relationship between the economic and environmental spheres [ 38 ]. Moreover, Špička et al [ 39 ], based on the experience of farms in the Czech Republic, underline, that a trade-off between environmental sustainability and economic performance occurs primarily among farming specialisation categories.…”
The objective of this paper is to identify the relationship between farm income and assets within the European Union (EU) in the context of economic and environmental sustainable development. The scientific context is connected to economic theory (the recognition of the nature of such a relationship, as well as the determination of whether sustainable development acts as a stimulant or destimulant under these conditions). The Farm Accounting Data Network system was employed in the article. The econometric models were estimated by panel data based on the reported results of the farms operations in EU member states for the period of 2004–2018. Accordingly, the relationship between income and assets is positive and statistically significant, but not very clear in the group of surveyed farms. Moreover, economic sustainability was found to positively influences the relationship between income and assets. In contrast, the relationship between incomes and assets was weakened. The situation is brought about by the intrinsic growth in the value of the land, as well as by the growing importance of non-productive assets. Thus, farmers in EU countries are becoming wealthier in terms of the value of their assets but, this is not reflected directly in their income. The reason is the growing importance of environmental and social functions in the agriculture the European Union. Greater skills in asset management at farm level are, therefore, required to mitigate the situation.
“…Pendekatan dalam pengembangan kakao antara lain melalui kegiatan agribisnis yang berorientasi pada inovasi teknologi dan peningkatan daya saing, pengembangan usaha ekonomi yang berkelanjutan serta dilaksanakan dalam kerangka otonomi/kawasan untuk memperkuat perekonomian daerah, yang selanjutkan akan memperkuat ekonomi nasional. Langkah operasional strategis yang ditempuh harus terintegrasi dari hulu ke hilir, baik dari aspek komoditas maupun kelembagaannya (Yuliandi, 2014;Mulyono, 2016;Arfah, 2019;Špička et al, 2020;Leksono et al 2021). Peningkatan daya saing dapat dilakukan melalui inovasi on farm (budidaya dan panen) maupun inovasi off farm (pengolahan dan pemasaran), serta peningkatan kapasitas sumber daya manusia yang terlibat dalam pengembangan komoditas kakao tersebut.…”
Kontribusi industri kakao bagi perekonomian Indonesia sangat besar. Diantaranya sebagai kontributor penerimaan devisa negara yang dapat diandalkan. Disamping itu, masih menjadi andalan dalam penyerapan tenaga kerja, terlihat menjadi sumber pendapatan bagi sekitar 1,7 juta kepala keluarga petani yang sebagian besar berada di Kawasan Timur Indonesia (KTI), juga berperan dalam mendorong pengembangan wilayah dan pengembangan agroindustri. Untuk mengoptimalkan potensi tersebut diperlukan suatu pendekatan dan desain pengembangan kakao yang tidak saja diarahkan pada upaya meningkatkan produktivitas tanaman semata, tetapi peningkatan efisiensi, nilai tambah produk, daya saing, dan kemandirian bidang industri juga harus menjadi bagian yang tidak terpisahkan dari aspek pengembangan kakao nasional. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk membahas konsep pendekatan dan desain pengembangan kawasan kakao berbasis inovasi dan upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk meningkatkan daya saing kakao Indonesia di pasar internasional, serta memberikan rekomendasi kebijakan untuk mendukung desain pengembangan tersebut. Pengembangan Kawasan berbasis inovasi dan berdaya saing, bukan saja dalam wujud teknologi, namun sesuatu yang dapat menyebabkan perbaikan atau menjadikan lebih baik, lebih sederhana, lebih murah, dan lebih mudah. Inovasi dimaksud yakni inovasi cara/teknik/metode. Desain pengembangannya, memfokuskan pada 4 pilar: (1) mekanisme delivery teknologi; (2) sumberdaya; (3) rantai pasok; dan (4) lembaga.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.