“…The current literature has made some meaningful attempt in studying factors that might influence or even mitigate these symptoms of mission drift, such as prudential regulation and supervision on some specific issues (Abdulai & Tewari, 2017), government regulations on the corporate governance in the microfinance sector (Okoye et al, 2017), risk preference of loan officer (Jia, Cull, Guo, & Ma, 2016), loan portfolio design (Lopatta et al, 2017), and the influence of CEOs' gender (Hartarska, Nadolnyak, & Mersland, 2014) as well as the staff training and adequate incentive of loan officer (Aubert, Janvry, & Sadoulet, 2009) in MFIs on the tradeoff between financial sustainability and social goals. Although these meaningful attempts have been made, the extant studies on microfinance still do not answer fundamentally whether it is possible to balance the paradoxical nature of the dual missions of MFIs and if it is possible, how to balance the two conflicting missions of MFIs.…”