2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade-Off Between Dimethyl Sulfide and Isoprene Emissions from Marine Phytoplankton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
6
65
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore we used isoprene measurements as well as different phytoplankton marker pigment measurements to derive in-field production rates for haptophytes, cyanobacteria, Prochlorococcus, chlorophytes, and diatoms in different regions. The results confirm findings from previous laboratory studies that the isoprene production is influenced by light and ocean temperature, due to stress, and by nutrients, due to their effect on changing phytoplankton communities and their abundances (e.g., Dani and Loreto, 2017;Shaw et al, 2010). Moreover, our data lead to the conclusion that isoprene production rates in the field, irrespective of phytoplankton communities and their abundance, are influenced by nutrient levels, which has never been shown before.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore we used isoprene measurements as well as different phytoplankton marker pigment measurements to derive in-field production rates for haptophytes, cyanobacteria, Prochlorococcus, chlorophytes, and diatoms in different regions. The results confirm findings from previous laboratory studies that the isoprene production is influenced by light and ocean temperature, due to stress, and by nutrients, due to their effect on changing phytoplankton communities and their abundances (e.g., Dani and Loreto, 2017;Shaw et al, 2010). Moreover, our data lead to the conclusion that isoprene production rates in the field, irrespective of phytoplankton communities and their abundance, are influenced by nutrient levels, which has never been shown before.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Laboratory culture experiments show that stress factors, like temperature and light, also influence the emission rate within one species (Shaw et al, 2003;Exton et al, 2013;Meskhidze et al, 2015). Srikanta Dani et al (2017) showed that in a light regime of 100-600 µmol m −2 s −1 the isoprene emission rate was constantly increasing with higher light levels for the diatom Chaetoceros calcitrans, whereas the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum was highest at 200 µmol m −2 s −1 and decreased at higher light levels. Furthermore, health conditions (Shaw et al, 2003), as well as the growth stage of the phytoplankton species (Milne et al, 1995), can also influence the isoprene emission rate.…”
Section: Modeling Chl-a-normalized Isoprene Production Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous analyses of DMSP have focused on marine phytoplankton and plants where it is found in higher concentrations. This has led to a hypothesis that DMSP formation competes with the emission of isoprene during stress (Dani and Loreto, 2017). If replicated in vascular plants, this would have major implications for our understanding of the regulation VOC emissions during stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal cause of bleaching is the overproduction of harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS) mostly originating from the photoinhibition of Photosystem II at increased temperature and irradiance (Tchernov et al, 2011), and Symbiodinium can provide clade-specific defences to harmful ROS including enhanced protection against UV radiation (Baker, 2003), higher growth (Little et al, 2004), and increased thermal tolerance (Baker et al, 2004). Since DMSP and DMS readily scavenge ROS (Sunda et al, 2002) and algae are known to use DMS to mitigate ROS-induced metabolic damage under sublethal environmental stresses (Archer et al, 2010;Dani and Loreto, 2017), it is possible that they are part of an antioxidant mechanism that leads to the scavenging of ROS and production of DMSO in symbiotic cnidarians (Gardner et al, 2016;Jones and King, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%