2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1632222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade Liberalization and Wage Inequality in the Philippines

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to earlier research, because of the effect of income from production factors, foreign trade has improved the income level of unskilled labourers in developing countries, which had advantages pertaining to labour endowment, thereby narrowing the income gap (Deardorff, 1982;Bhagwati & Srinivasan, 2002;Bhagwati, 2004). Regrettably, this theory was not supported by evidence from developing countries, particularly India (Kumar & Mishra, 2008), the Philippines (Hasan & Jandoc, 2010), and 17 countries in Latin America (Perry & Olarreaga, 2006). In those countries, the income gap was expanding instead of narrowing, during the greater foreign exposure era.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to earlier research, because of the effect of income from production factors, foreign trade has improved the income level of unskilled labourers in developing countries, which had advantages pertaining to labour endowment, thereby narrowing the income gap (Deardorff, 1982;Bhagwati & Srinivasan, 2002;Bhagwati, 2004). Regrettably, this theory was not supported by evidence from developing countries, particularly India (Kumar & Mishra, 2008), the Philippines (Hasan & Jandoc, 2010), and 17 countries in Latin America (Perry & Olarreaga, 2006). In those countries, the income gap was expanding instead of narrowing, during the greater foreign exposure era.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Haskel and Slaughter (2001) conducted empirical research on these aspects in England; While Bernard and Jensen (1997), and Ebenstein, Harrison, Margaret & Shannon (2009) conducted empirical research related to America. There are also some scholars who conducted this research on developing countries, like Mexico (Harrison & Hanson, 1999); Chile (Beyer, Rojas & Vergara, 1999); Columbia (Goldberg & Pavcnik, 2007) and the Phillipines (Hasan & Jandoc, 2010). Research on foreign trade for both developing and developed countries indicates that foreign trade has had an effect on the income gap, from the perspective of industry, region and the individual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide array of empirical studies have explored the effects of globalization's various facets on income inequality, including trade (Hasan and Jandoc, 2010), structural adjustment (Lim and Montes, 2000), and premature deindustrialization (Tuaño and Cruz, 2019). More limited, however, are studies on the effects specifically of flexible employment arrangements on incomes, with the exception of Nguyen, Nguyen-Huu, and Le (2016) who identified a significant gap between wages of permanent and non-regular workers in Asian labor markets, including the Philippines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%