2017
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20161214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade Liberalization and Regional Dynamics

Abstract: We study the evolution of trade liberalization's effects on Brazilian local labor markets. Regions facing larger tariff cuts experienced prolonged declines in formal sector employment and earnings relative to other regions. The impact of tariff changes on regional earnings 20 years after liberalization was three times the effect after 10 years. These increasing effects on regional earnings are inconsistent with conventional spatial equilibrium models, which predict declining effects due to spatial arbitrage. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
200
3
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 391 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
23
200
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The blinkering of vision by HO theory, with its assumption of costless factor mobility within countries, also had the unfortunate effect of causing economists to forget that the social costs of expansion of trade tend to be concentrated on narrowly defined industries, occupations and—with strong persistence—localities (Autor, Dorn, & Hanson, ; Dix‐Carneiro & Kovak, ). This concentration of effects and associated adjustment costs, long recognised in specific‐factors theory and in the political economy of trade policy, was for example discussed in less than 500 words of the 500‐page Wood (), being sidelined by the simpler—though also important—view of skilled workers as a class gaining at the expense of unskilled workers.…”
Section: Who Got What Wrong In the 1990s Debate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blinkering of vision by HO theory, with its assumption of costless factor mobility within countries, also had the unfortunate effect of causing economists to forget that the social costs of expansion of trade tend to be concentrated on narrowly defined industries, occupations and—with strong persistence—localities (Autor, Dorn, & Hanson, ; Dix‐Carneiro & Kovak, ). This concentration of effects and associated adjustment costs, long recognised in specific‐factors theory and in the political economy of trade policy, was for example discussed in less than 500 words of the 500‐page Wood (), being sidelined by the simpler—though also important—view of skilled workers as a class gaining at the expense of unskilled workers.…”
Section: Who Got What Wrong In the 1990s Debate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Dix‐Carneiro and Kovak () describe a general model with trade reform and regional labor‐market dynamics. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of trade liberalisation have long been widely explored in the literature (Brandt et al, 2017;Dix-Carneiro & Kovak, 2017). However, economic globalisation has been increasingly questioned after entering the 21st century.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%