Trade, Investment and Beyond: The Impact of WTO Accession on China's Legal System

Abstract

This article assesses the impact of China's accession to the World Trade Organization on its foreign trade and investment regime. While the government had begun liberalizing the Chinese economy long before joining the WTO, the accession induced regulatory, institutional and normative changes that have transformed the landscape of trade and investment in China. The profound impact of the WTO stems directly from the extensive commercial and rule commitments China undertook in its accession. Focusing on the most significant of these commitments, the article examines their implications for Chinese constitutional law and their effect on the regulation of foreign trade, foreign investment, intellectual property rights and domestic governance. Additionally, it looks at the impact of WTO disputes on Chinese law and practice. It concludes that China's accession has made its foreign trade and investment regime far more liberalized and less opaque than a decade ago. More importantly, the accession has institutionalized the process of China's domestic reform externally through the force of WTO obligations. Although much uncertainty remains concerning the future direction of government policies, WTO membership ensures that the course of China's economic development will be charted within the disciplines of the WTO system.

Evolution of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment Regime: Implications for Southeast Asia Under the Belt and Road Initiative

“…And the 'Go Global' policy contributed to the rising trend of Chinese OFDI subsequently (Wang & Zhao, 2017). In compliance with accession of the WTO in 2001, China gradually opened its once protected markets (Qin, 2007). The business environment for Chinese firms changed dramatically.…”

China–Cellulose Pulp: China's Quest to Satisfy WTO Panels and the Appellate Body

“…One of the obligations of the ADA is the establishment of judicial review mechanisms for trade remedy measures. Prior to its accession agreement, anti-dumping decisions were specifically excluded from judicial review in China under the Administrative Litigation Law (Qin, 2007: 736). Although China designated the Beijing Interim People's Court to hear judicial reviews of anti-dumping investigations, as of 2017 no cases had been brought to the court for review 84 .…”

Institutional reforms and development of corporate governance and banking system in China

“…Qin (2007) argues that China"s accession to WTO has made its foreign trade and investment regime much more liberalized and less opaque than a decade ago, specially by institutionalizing the process of China's domestic reform externally through the force of WTO obligations. Consistent with these developments, Firth et al (2009) provide evidence that Chinese banks provide loans to financially healthier and better-governed firms.…”