Trade, Intellectual Property Rights, and the World Trade Organization

Abstract

This paper surveys the literature on international trade and the protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the global economy. The discussion is organized around the major questions in the field. How does openness to trade affect national incentives for patent protection? What is the rationale for international coordination over patent policies? Given that countries are highly asymmetric with respect to their technological capabilities, what incentives do lagging countries have for enforcing IPRs and what are the consequences of requiring them to do so? To what extent do empirical studies support the major arguments for and against the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)? Finally, can the structure of TRIPS-both in terms of the core obligations it imposes on WTO members and the flexibilities that it provides them with respect to exhaustion policies and the use of compulsory licensing-be reconciled with existing models of IPR protection in the global economy? For helpful comments and discussions, I thank

Export quality and patent protection: Stage‐dependent effects in development

“…Are our results biased because the innovative component of the exportable good was developed elsewhere? Even in this instance, patent rights should matter to the foreign companies that transfer their technology to the local producer in the offshoring/outsourcing country, as the foreign technology owner could have concerns about misappropriation or piracy (see Glass and Saggi, 2002; Saggi, 2016). Under weak protection, the foreign company may not transfer the necessary knowledge or know‐how to enable the local producer to manufacture a higher‐quality good.…”

The Evolution of the Treatment of Agriculture in Preferential Trade Agreements

“…Intellectual property (IP) rights can affect not only the process of technology transfer via licensing and FDI, but also the pattern of international trade (Saggi, 2016). Previous analysis has found that IP-related trade agreements have significant effects on the aggregate trade of PTA members (Maskus and Ridley, 2016).…”

Price Controls versus Compulsory Licensing: Effects on Patent Holders and Consumers

“…Thus, from a technological perspective, the two types of licensing are identical. 11 We allow the South to compensate the local licensee for any losses that it might su¤er under CL. With these assumptions, the welfare of the South under CL equals:…”