2014
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8268.12095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade in Intermediate Inputs and Trade Facilitation in Africa's Regional Integration

Abstract: Despite concerted efforts, Africa's regional integration process has encountered delays. Since the third stage of the Abuja Treaty in 2008, piecemeal progress has been observed. It therefore begs a difficult but relevant question: why is the regional integration process stalling? The conventional answer lies in challenges such as inadequate financial resources and infrastructure for trade among others. However, an approach is proposed to refocus regional integration on resource-based industrialization. The lev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This contribution builds on the need for more economic integration and policy harmonization discussed in Africa (Akpan, 2014;KayizziMugerwa et al, 2014;Njifen, 2014). Others: Charaf-Eddine and Strauss (2014); Baricako and Ndongo (2014); Nshimbi and Fioramonti (2014); Ebaidalla and Yahia (2014); Ofa and Karingi (2014); Shuaibu (2015) and Tumwebaze and Ijjo (2015).Thisinquiry is based on two theories: (i) countries with lower levels of the underlying factors (per worker output, TFP and technological gain) are more likely to catch-up their counterparts of higher levels. (ii) According to Martin and Sunley (1998) and Temple (1999)if technology is a public good and can cross national borders, over time Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries should be able to adapt and adopt modern technology, and in the long-run the rate of technological progress would be similar among SSA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This contribution builds on the need for more economic integration and policy harmonization discussed in Africa (Akpan, 2014;KayizziMugerwa et al, 2014;Njifen, 2014). Others: Charaf-Eddine and Strauss (2014); Baricako and Ndongo (2014); Nshimbi and Fioramonti (2014); Ebaidalla and Yahia (2014); Ofa and Karingi (2014); Shuaibu (2015) and Tumwebaze and Ijjo (2015).Thisinquiry is based on two theories: (i) countries with lower levels of the underlying factors (per worker output, TFP and technological gain) are more likely to catch-up their counterparts of higher levels. (ii) According to Martin and Sunley (1998) and Temple (1999)if technology is a public good and can cross national borders, over time Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries should be able to adapt and adopt modern technology, and in the long-run the rate of technological progress would be similar among SSA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This contribution builds on the need for more economic integration and policy harmonization discussed in Africa (Akpan, ; Kayizzi‐Mugerwa et al ., ; Njifen, ). Others include: Charaf‐Eddine and Strauss (); Baricako and Ndongo (); Nshimbi and Fioramonti (); Ebaidalla and Yahia (); Ofa and Karingi (); Shuaibu () and Tumwebaze and Ijjo (). This inquiry is based on two theories: (1) countries with lower levels of the underlying factors (per worker output, TFP and technological gain) are more likely to catch up their counterparts of higher levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Kose et al (2006), many developing countries rapidly embraced integration polices because the anticipated rewards were higher compared to those for developed nations. Unfortunately, the surge in financial flows was 2 Other recent studies within this literature stream include Baricako and Ndongo (2014), Ebaidalla and Yahia (2014), Charaf-Eddine and Strauss (2014), Nshimbi and Fioramonti (2014), Ofa and Karingi (2014), Shuaibu (2015), and Tumwebaze and Ijjo (2015). 3 The benefits of globalization for developing countries are still subject to a heated debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%