2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2293896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade Elasticity and Vertical Specialisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 A second strand of the literature argues that the change in the relationship is mainly cyclical, e.g. Boz et al (2014), who suggest that most of the decline in trade is explained by cyclical 10 Note that their definition of cyclical vs. structural factors is different to ours, as it refers to long vs. short-run properties of their country-speficic error correction models. A particular sub-section is devoted to this issue (Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 A second strand of the literature argues that the change in the relationship is mainly cyclical, e.g. Boz et al (2014), who suggest that most of the decline in trade is explained by cyclical 10 Note that their definition of cyclical vs. structural factors is different to ours, as it refers to long vs. short-run properties of their country-speficic error correction models. A particular sub-section is devoted to this issue (Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We revisit world trade elasticities under an import demand function framework, for which the excellent work of Constantinescu et al (2015) provided a useful but incomplete assessment, as they acknowledge: "while we cannot directly test the relative importance of these factors, we provide some circumstantial evidence on how far each might have contributed to the observed slowdown". 10 As a matter of fact, many of their arguments have been addressed more formally in the papers that we review below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on the trade collapse discussed several mechanisms through which vertical specialization may increase the short-term responsiveness of trade to GDP -e.g. if expenditure declines more in vertically specialized sectors (Bems et al, 2011), if there are inventory -also called bullwhip-effects (Altomonte et al, 2012), or if there is re-nationalization of production chains (Buono and Vergara-Caffarelli, 2013).…”
Section: Changes In Vertical Specializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on the trade collapse discussed several mechanisms through which vertical specialization may increase the short-term responsiveness of trade to GDP -e.g. if expenditure declines more in vertically specialized sectors (Bems et al, 2011), if there are inventory -also called bullwhip-effects (Altomonte et al, 2012), or if there is re-nationalization of production chains (Buono and Vergara-Caffarelli, 2013). 15 Similarly, we find evidence that the elasticity of durables trade has decreased from 2.7 in the long 1990s to 0.8 in the 2000s.…”
Section: Changes In Vertical Specializationmentioning
confidence: 51%