1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1096-7508(00)00022-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade and foreign direct investment management strategies for U.S. processed food firms in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This parameter estimate was highly significant at the 1% level, and these results imply that U.S. agribusinesses invest in high-income countries. The importance of G D P has been verified by Gopinath, Pick, and Vasavada (1999); Marchant, Saghaian, and Vickner;Lipsey and Weiss (1981); and Ning and Reed. Empirical results indicate that relative compensation rates (foreign compensation rate relative to U.S. compensation rate) positively affect FDI. Similar results were obtained by Barrell and Pain and by Gopinath, Pick, and Vasavada (1999).…”
Section: Fdi Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This parameter estimate was highly significant at the 1% level, and these results imply that U.S. agribusinesses invest in high-income countries. The importance of G D P has been verified by Gopinath, Pick, and Vasavada (1999); Marchant, Saghaian, and Vickner;Lipsey and Weiss (1981); and Ning and Reed. Empirical results indicate that relative compensation rates (foreign compensation rate relative to U.S. compensation rate) positively affect FDI. Similar results were obtained by Barrell and Pain and by Gopinath, Pick, and Vasavada (1999).…”
Section: Fdi Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Another large body of literature has concentrated on the relationship between FDI and trade policy in agriculture and food industry, but the empirical results appear mixed (Overend et al , 1997; Pagoulatos, 1983). Viewing empirical studies from a developed versus developing country perspective indicates that the relationship between FDI and export tends to be substitutive between developed countries (Gopinath et al , 1999; Furtan and Holzman, 2004), and complementary from developed to developing countries (Malanoski et al , 1997; Marchant et al , 1999).…”
Section: Determinants Of Fdi Inflow To China's Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the proximity-concentration trade-off hypothesis, FDI and exports are substitutes (Belderbos and Sleuwaegen, 1998;Gopinath et al1999.). In contrast, the spillover effects of multinational corporations on productivity of local firms in the host countries resulting from vertical FDI give rise to the complementarity between FDI and exports (Pfaffermayer, 1994;Brainard, 1997;Co, 1997;Marchant et al, 1999;Clausing, 2000;Jensen, 2002;Wilson, 2006.) In a second line of inquiry, which reflects our second contribution to the literature, we test the presence of third-country effects.…”
Section: Figure 1: Trends In Fdi Outflows: a Regional Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%