2019
DOI: 10.1097/bpb.0000000000000586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traction does not decrease failure of reduction and femoral head avascular necrosis in patients aged 6–24 months with developmental dysplasia of the hip treated by closed reduction: a review of 385 patients and meta-analysis

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the effects of preliminary traction on the rate of failure of reduction and the incidence of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) in patients with late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip treated by closed reduction. A total of 385 patients (440 hips) treated by closed reduction satisfied the inclusion criteria. Patients were divided in two groups according to treatment modality: a traction group (276 patients) and a no-traction group (109 patients). Tönnis grade, rate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
21
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors concluded that the Petit-Morel method was the treatment of choice for children aged between 6 months and 3 years who were affected by idiopathic DDH. On the contrary, other authors in three different comparative studies that included a large series of dislocated hips reported that preliminary traction (overhead or longitudinal) did not decrease the failure of reduction or the incidence of AVN [12,13,19]. Schur et al [33] even reported an increased risk of AVN when prereduction traction was used in a series of 70 children (82 hips).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors concluded that the Petit-Morel method was the treatment of choice for children aged between 6 months and 3 years who were affected by idiopathic DDH. On the contrary, other authors in three different comparative studies that included a large series of dislocated hips reported that preliminary traction (overhead or longitudinal) did not decrease the failure of reduction or the incidence of AVN [12,13,19]. Schur et al [33] even reported an increased risk of AVN when prereduction traction was used in a series of 70 children (82 hips).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The use of preliminary traction to facilitate closed reduction or to decrease the risk of avascular necrosis (AVN) is still debated [11][12][13]. In the 1980s, some authors questioned the role of preliminary traction in the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) and suspended its use, reporting satisfactory results in patients treated for CDH without preliminary traction, with a low incidence of AVN [14,15].…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children with congenital dysplasia benefit from early diagnosis and reasonable treatment to achieve a favorable prognosis [ 17 , 18 ], but there are still some cases with delayed diagnosis or poor conservative treatment efficacy that require surgical treatment. Surgical treatment is mainly to restore the concentric relationship between the femoral head and the acetabulum, whilst avoiding femoral head necrosis and reoperation [ 19 , 20 ]. Traction + reposition + hip spica cast is a common clinical treatment for DDH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, follow-up time is enough to make sure as to whether AVN has occurred or not, as reported by previously published studies. 1,5,6,16 The correlation coefficient between the size of femoral head and incidence of AVN is relatively weak (r = -0.287); therefore, further studies with larger number of patients are needed to evaluate the effects of the size of femoral head on the incidence of AVN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%