Brain Mapping 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00316-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tract-Based Spatial Statistics and Other Approaches for Cross-Subject Comparison of Local Diffusion MRI Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 96 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TBSS overcomes the difficulties of achieving accurate registration of the WM by projecting all participants’ FA data onto a mean FA tract skeleton before applying voxelwise cross-participant statistics. However, the FA skeleton includes only the center of WM tracts 37 and may not capture WM local to GM network regions; hence, we conducted both in an exploratory analysis to determine which is most sensitive to FA changes in and around RSNs. Next, we extracted median ACM, FA, and CBF values from the RSNs and compared them between CI and CP patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TBSS overcomes the difficulties of achieving accurate registration of the WM by projecting all participants’ FA data onto a mean FA tract skeleton before applying voxelwise cross-participant statistics. However, the FA skeleton includes only the center of WM tracts 37 and may not capture WM local to GM network regions; hence, we conducted both in an exploratory analysis to determine which is most sensitive to FA changes in and around RSNs. Next, we extracted median ACM, FA, and CBF values from the RSNs and compared them between CI and CP patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%