1999
DOI: 10.1109/5254.784087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking with text-based messages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypothesis , i.e., the th hypothesis that includes the observations , is built by means of appropriately appending some permutation, , of the new measurements to the hypothesis from the previous time. Thus (1) Let denote the set of measurements until time instant ; it consists of (2) The goal is to obtain (3) that is, to calculate the probability of the th active hypothesis after associating the observations collected until time instant . Using Bayes rule, this probability can be shown to be proportional to the product of the following three probabilities (4) The last term of this equation is the probability of the parent hypothesis and is, therefore, available from the previous iteration.…”
Section: A the Mht Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hypothesis , i.e., the th hypothesis that includes the observations , is built by means of appropriately appending some permutation, , of the new measurements to the hypothesis from the previous time. Thus (1) Let denote the set of measurements until time instant ; it consists of (2) The goal is to obtain (3) that is, to calculate the probability of the th active hypothesis after associating the observations collected until time instant . Using Bayes rule, this probability can be shown to be proportional to the product of the following three probabilities (4) The last term of this equation is the probability of the parent hypothesis and is, therefore, available from the previous iteration.…”
Section: A the Mht Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first factor of equation (4) is directly used since vehicle dynamics are assumed known; the third factor does not need any change either; the second factor, on the other hand, is understood as a vehicle compatibility measurement, i.e., how likely it is that an observer reports a car for example and the association is made to a track in which the vehicle is, possibly, different from a car (a jeep, a small van or others). The authors demonstrated in [1] that an MHT-like algorithm so built, will eventually reach a correct solution in a worst case scenario under a very mild condition, specifically, provided that the probability of reporting vehicle when vehicle is the actual vehicle is greater than the probability of reporting any other type of vehicle with .…”
Section: A the Mht Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations