2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11141719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking the Land Use/Land Cover Change in an Area with Underground Mining and Reforestation via Continuous Landsat Classification

Abstract: Understanding the changes in a land use/land cover (LULC) is important for environmental assessment and land management. However, tracking the dynamic of LULC has proved difficult, especially in large-scale underground mining areas with extensive LULC heterogeneity and a history of multiple disturbances. Additional research related to the methods in this field is still needed. In this study, we tracked the LULC change in the Nanjiao mining area, Shanxi Province, China between 1987 and 2017 via random forest cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we conducted a field survey. Some studies have found that the Random Forest Method (RF) provided the highest accuracy (86%) [35]. Therefore, we applied the random forest algorithm for landscape classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we conducted a field survey. Some studies have found that the Random Forest Method (RF) provided the highest accuracy (86%) [35]. Therefore, we applied the random forest algorithm for landscape classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we divided the vegetation into trees (natural forest, cultivated forest, mixed forest), shrubs, and herbs (high‐coverage grassland and low‐coverage grassland) based on existing LULC in the Nanjiao mining area; other types of LULC (farm land, bare land, buildings, and photovoltaic panels) were all categorized into one class: others. The results of each LULC come from our previous study (Mi et al, 2019), and a detailed process of LULC classification is also provided in the Supporting Information. Then, the tree, shrub, and herb communities that maintained the same type between 1987 and 2017 were extracted by combining the LULC classification results in 1987, 1997, 2007, and 2017.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al [15] applied Landsat images from 1990 to 2015 at five-year intervals to classify impervious surface and non-impervious surface areas using a linear spectral mixture analysis of the six selected metropoles in the coastal and inland metropoles in 2015, achieving an overall accuracy varying from 94% to 95%. Mi et al [14] applied an RF classifier with time-series Landsat datasets (1987-2017) to detect the LULC changes in a mining area, achieving an average OA of about 84%. Buitre et al [13] applied a support vector machine with time-series Landsat datasets (1987-2016) to classify mangroves, non-mangroves, seawater, and clouds in the Philippines and attained an average OA of about 84%.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessment Of Lulc Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accelerated urban growth and LULC changes exert pressure on the natural environment and human welfare and have become a global concern [8]. Several studies on LULC changes and their impacts have been conducted worldwide from multiple dimensions using satellite remote sensing and GIS technology [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. All of these studies require time-series datasets that are mostly derived from Earth observation satellites to classify multitemporal LULC maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%