2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking the inequalities of global per capita carbon emissions from perspectives of technological and economic gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…China's most commonly used principle was regional equal per capita carbon emissions. 15,52,53 The Paris Agreement allows signatories to set their own emission reduction goals based on nationally determined contributions (NDCs), with allocation principles being essential for NDC goals. Currently, a single principle might not be able to solve the issue of the proper allocation of NDCs, and thus, many academics have proposed different allocation principles according to the "effort-sharing" principle.…”
Section: Regional Carbon Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…China's most commonly used principle was regional equal per capita carbon emissions. 15,52,53 The Paris Agreement allows signatories to set their own emission reduction goals based on nationally determined contributions (NDCs), with allocation principles being essential for NDC goals. Currently, a single principle might not be able to solve the issue of the proper allocation of NDCs, and thus, many academics have proposed different allocation principles according to the "effort-sharing" principle.…”
Section: Regional Carbon Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the influence of climate change has a long duration, usually spanning several generations, and thus, the carbon emission rights allocation should balance the welfare and development rights between contemporary and future generations, referred to as “intergenerational carbon equity” in this paper. Second, climate change has strong externalities, requiring collaborative cooperation and negotiation, and involves allocating carbon emission rights among different countries/regions. Thus, “regional carbon equity” is primarily concerned with the socioeconomic effect of different allocation standards among countries/regions. Some studies have analyzed the heterogeneity status among countries/regions under a specific allocation assumption, which was also classified into regional carbon equity in this paper. Therefore, intergenerational carbon equity is primarily concerned with the generational level, while regional carbon equity focuses on the national or regional level.…”
Section: Classification Of Research Dimensions On Carbon Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their research, employing the Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) method, revealed that GI exerted a more substantial influence in reducing emissions within the highest emissions quantiles, while its impact was comparatively muted in the lowest quantiles. In a complementary study [ 21 ], observed the positive impact of GI on the environmental sustainability of BRICS countries from 1990 to 2014 [ 22 ]. further contributed to this discourse by utilizing the Pooled Mean Group (PMG) estimation method, suggesting the potential long-term benefits of GI for environmental sustainability [ 23 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such actions can also support energy or carbon market efficiency by addressing decentralized low-carbon incentives. Historically, national-and city-level managers made recommendations and policies from sectoral and functional viewpoints, whereas relevant practitioners often made suggestions and took action from an industry perspective [42][43][44]. While all stakeholders' actions may assist cities in advancing toward an NZC future, complete solutions that incorporate various efforts will have a stronger beneficial influence on establishing a more sustainable, resilient, and inclusive city of the future [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%