Tracking the Conservation Promise of Movement Ecology

Abstract

From butterflies to elephants, the rapidly developing science of movement ecology is providing increasingly detailed spatio-temporal data on a wide array of mobile animals. Thus, this discipline also holds great promise for improving the conservation of wildlife. To measure progress toward this promise, we investigated the degree to which movement ecology research is connected to conservation goals as well as the proportion of studies that were incorporated into federal and international status assessments for mobile species at risk. We examined 13,349 "movement ecology" papers published between 1990 and 2014 and found that explicit connections to conservation and management were made in 35% (n = 4, 672) of these papers, with the number of connections increasing over time. We then measured the uptake of movement ecology research into species status assessment and recovery plans (n = 72 documents) produced by three different governance agencies for 12 endangered mobile species. We found that on average 60% of available movement ecology research was used in the status assessment process, demonstrating that when movement ecology research is available, it is generally being utilized in conservation planning. However, for 25% of these species, there was little movement research available to be used, highlighting that knowledge gaps remain for some at-risk species despite the general growth of movement ecology research. We outline opportunities for movement ecology to promote more effective conservation of taxa that move.

Automated VHF Radiotelemetry Revealed Site-Specific Differences in Fall Migration Strategies of Semipalmated Sandpipers on Stopover in the Gulf of Maine

“…In summary, the use of automated VHF radiotelemetry to track individual movements of Semipalmated Sandpipers revealed important site-based, and not age-based, differences in migratory behavior and movements within and beyond the Gulf of Maine region. Impending sea level rise, ocean acidification, and increased human activity will have profound impacts on future shorebird populations worldwide (Galbraith et al, 2005;Iwamura et al, 2013;Fraser et al, 2018). Future research and resource management should be directed toward factors that affect individual behavior, including local as well as regional scale topography, habitat characteristics, human activity, and the degree of connectivity among different sites at the regional and continental scale.…”

Vectors with autonomy: what distinguishes animal‐mediated nutrient transport from abiotic vectors?

“…Although the number of applied models incorporating organism movement is increasing (Holyoak et al, ; Grüss et al, ), understanding how behavioural responses change in altered environments can lend greater predictive power to changes in active subsidy nutrient distribution than considering movement patterns alone (Fraser et al, ). For example, HIREC could reduce the extent of active subsidy agent movement by increasing fragmentation (i.e.…”

No room to roam: King Cobras reduce movement in agriculture

“…Understanding habitat requirements, via animal movement, can help prioritise areas to protect from 41 land-use conversion, inform management, and build conservation plans (Fraser et al 2018). 42…”