2021
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2020.3044093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking System for Fast Moving Nodes in Optical Mobile Communication and the Design Rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was achieved by deriving the expressions of probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) under different channel fading models, such as K distribution [12,13], Log-Normal distribution [14,15], Γ − Γ distribution [16][17][18][19], and generalized Málaga distribution [20,21], etc. The results demonstrate a strong dependence of performance indices on adjustable system parameters, such as beam divergence angle, transmitted optical power, and receiver's FOV angle [14,[21][22][23]. Additionally, the OBDA varies with different factors, such as transmitted optical power [14,21,[24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This was achieved by deriving the expressions of probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) under different channel fading models, such as K distribution [12,13], Log-Normal distribution [14,15], Γ − Γ distribution [16][17][18][19], and generalized Málaga distribution [20,21], etc. The results demonstrate a strong dependence of performance indices on adjustable system parameters, such as beam divergence angle, transmitted optical power, and receiver's FOV angle [14,[21][22][23]. Additionally, the OBDA varies with different factors, such as transmitted optical power [14,21,[24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast, VLC systems employ illumination LEDs whose viewing angles are generally above 90 • , making the ATP process unnecessary. OMC channels are also different from the FSO channels because the turbulence-induced fading in FSO systems is negligible in OMC systems as the links are shorter [15]. Besides, the causes of the pointing error in FSO systems are mainly transceiver sway and platform vibration, while those of the OMC systems are the positioning error and the imperfection of the steering units.…”
Section: Available Channel Models and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes their stochastic model different. Despite of all the differences, it is still valid to exploit the intensity distribution of the Gaussian beams in FSO channels [4], and the relation between received power and the incident light direction in VLC channels [15].…”
Section: Available Channel Models and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above mathematical principle, the aim of this paper is to analyze the potential performance of OMC and compare it with existing schemes. Implementation issues, including the beam adaptation schemes and demo, positioning and coherent transmitting and receiving techniques, and their feasibilities, can be found in [19,29,30]. Improved or new implementations will be developed in future works.…”
Section: System Model With a Single Light Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%