2013
DOI: 10.1190/geo2012-0071.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking of velocity variations at depth in the presence of surface velocity fluctuations

Abstract: We tested a small-scale experiment that is dedicated to the study of the wave separation algorithm and to the velocity variations monitoring problem itself. It handles the case in which velocity variations at depth are hidden by near-surface velocity fluctuations. Using an acquisition system that combines an array of sources and an array of receivers, coupled with controlled velocity variations, we tested the ability of beam-forming techniques to track velocity variations separately for body waves and surface … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constraints on the deeper parts of the fault, i.e., estimates of its dip [Yang et al, 2011], are limited due to the analysis of high-frequency surface waves. The application of double-beamforming techniques offers a potential tool to focus on noise wavefield components that are sensitive to properties at deeper parts of the fault [de Cacqueray et al, 2013]. The identification of a critical frequency f c , above which the wavefield within the FZ has significantly different properties compared to the surrounding region, is also compatible with observations based on ballistic waves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Constraints on the deeper parts of the fault, i.e., estimates of its dip [Yang et al, 2011], are limited due to the analysis of high-frequency surface waves. The application of double-beamforming techniques offers a potential tool to focus on noise wavefield components that are sensitive to properties at deeper parts of the fault [de Cacqueray et al, 2013]. The identification of a critical frequency f c , above which the wavefield within the FZ has significantly different properties compared to the surrounding region, is also compatible with observations based on ballistic waves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Laboratory physical modeling is frequently proposed with non‐contact ultrasonic techniques to study seismic wave propagation at various scales, with a wide range of applications in civil engineering (Ruiz and Nagy, 2004; Lu et al, 2011; Abraham et al, 2012), near‐surface geophysics (Bodet et al, 2005, 2009; Bretaudeau et al, 2011; Bergamo et al, 2014), exploration seismic (Campman et al, 2004, 2005; de Cacqueray et al, 2011, 2013), or seismology (Nishizawa et al, 1997; van Wijk and Levshin, 2004). The non‐contact character of ultrasonic techniques and their high‐density sampling abilities provide flexibility that gives the opportunity to reproduce typical seismic records in the laboratory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be addressed by cross‐equalization techniques for surface acquisition (Ross, Cunningham, and Weber ; Rickett and Lumley ), time‐lapse wave separation with buried systems in the field (Cotton, Michou, and Forgues ), or array‐processing techniques on physical models (de Cacqueray et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%