1991
DOI: 10.1109/7.85031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking of crossing targets with imaging sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed there, JMPD can be traced back to the event-averaged maximum likelihood estimation (EAMLE) work of Kastella [31,32] and many earlier works, e.g. [28,47,56]. Although this paper is more simply viewed as an application of the JMPD method developed in [31]- [33], it can also be viewed as an application of the FISST method in the setting of [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed there, JMPD can be traced back to the event-averaged maximum likelihood estimation (EAMLE) work of Kastella [31,32] and many earlier works, e.g. [28,47,56]. Although this paper is more simply viewed as an application of the JMPD method developed in [31]- [33], it can also be viewed as an application of the FISST method in the setting of [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the above diagram as a guide, the event probabil for two tracks, 'competing' for any number of common peak generated using the following (approximate) expressions: N2 j2 =-1 N2 j2=-1 A,,(ii ) =A Al(il EI fl'il ) -il =-I lities, s, are (7) (8) (9) In the expressions above, subscripts 1 and 2 denote the lIt and 2nd tracks respectively, j is the event index, N is the number of peaks associated by a given track, , is the PDA event probability, /3' and /3" are the un-normalized and normalized pairwise JPDA event probabilities (respectively), and 6 is the kronecker delta function. The event probabilities of the 2nd track are computed by exchanging the subscripts.…”
Section: I-1198mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when the track is deemed to be on a target, not clutter, and is presented to the operator). Approaches such as those described in [5][6][7][8][9][10], occupy the middle ground. In these 'hybrid' methods, local clutter statistics and detection characteristics (such as signal-to-noise ratio, peak shape and peak curvature) are generated by the detector and used by the tracker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While developed independently [10], [8], the JMPD method can be derived using the mathematics of random sets and expressed in the finite-set statistics framework [9]. As discussed in [11], JMPD can be traced back to the event-averaged maximum-likelihood estimation (EAMLE) work of Kastella [8], [10] and many earlier works, e.g., [12]- [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%