Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking emotions in the brain – Revisiting the Empathic Accuracy Task

Abstract: Many empathy tasks lack ecological validity due to their use of simplistic stimuli and static analytical approaches. Empathic accuracy tasks overcome these limitations by using autobiographical emotional video clips. Usually, a single measure of empathic accuracy is computed by correlating the participants' continuous ratings of the narrator's emotional state with the narrator's own ratings.In this study, we validated a modified empathic accuracy task. A valence-independent rating of the narrator's emotional i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
48
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Across all participants, our findings suggest higher accuracy when rating the emotional valence of the negative videos (mean = .99, SD = .06) than the positive videos (mean = .73, SD = .06). These results differ from a recent study in which participants rated empathic accuracy according to the video's degree of emotional intensity (rating emotional arousal level) instead of valence; our study only examined emotional valence but not emotional intensity (Mackes et al, 2018). Our divergent findings are likely due to the different ratings schemes (rating intensity vs. valence).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Across all participants, our findings suggest higher accuracy when rating the emotional valence of the negative videos (mean = .99, SD = .06) than the positive videos (mean = .73, SD = .06). These results differ from a recent study in which participants rated empathic accuracy according to the video's degree of emotional intensity (rating emotional arousal level) instead of valence; our study only examined emotional valence but not emotional intensity (Mackes et al, 2018). Our divergent findings are likely due to the different ratings schemes (rating intensity vs. valence).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Similar procedures to previous EAT studies were followed for calculating empathic accuracy ratings in order to maintain fidelity with previously reported results in other populations (Kral et al, 2017;J. Lee et al, 2011;Mackes et al, 2018;Zaki et al, 2009). Video 1 demonstrated very poor agreement for all participants and therefore was excluded from subsequent analyses (Video 1 average r = .01, SD = .14; Video 2 average r = .72, SD = .26; Video 3 average r = .41, SD = .40; Video 4 average r = .69, SD = .29; Video 5 average r = .74, SD = .12; Video 6 average r = .70, SD = .16).…”
Section: Empathic Accuracy Behavioural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In young adulthood, we imaged the brain's empathic response to others' emotions in the kangaroo care group and the controls, assessing how the brain sustains “empathic accuracy”, an important determinant of the empathic response 251,252 , and differentiates response to others' distress, sadness and joy. Using complex analysis, we detected three structures that showed highly dissimilar activations across emotions: the amygdala, anterior insula, and temporal pole.…”
Section: The Making Of the Resilient Child: Three Longitudinal High‐rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of self-report measures of empathy like the IRI demonstrate the necessity of also assessing empathy using more objective measures when evaluating behavioral change in the context of social cognitive training. One skill especially important toempathy that researchers have developed an objective measure for is of empathic accuracy; specifically, how correctly the perceiver is able to infer the thoughts and/or feelings of another person in everyday interactions or simulations of those interactions (35). Empathic accuracy can be measured using a paradigm that includes a video-cued procedure comparing the perceiver's affective ratings of a social target with that target's self-report.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%