2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking dynamic adjustments to decision making and performance monitoring processes in conflict tasks

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, before the onset of sensory evidence the ‘starting levels’ of the signals reflect biased motor preparation when prior expectations are biased ( de Lange et al, 2013 ), and are higher under speed pressure for both alternatives ( Kelly et al, 2021 ; Murphy et al, 2016 ; Steinemann et al, 2018 ), implementing the well-established decision variable (DV) adjustments assumed in models ( Bogacz et al, 2010 ; Hanks et al, 2014 ; Mulder et al, 2012 ). The signal contralateral to the chosen hand then reaches a highly similar level at response irrespective of stimulus conditions or RT, consistent with a fixed, action-triggering threshold ( Devine et al, 2019 ; Feuerriegel et al, 2021 ; Kelly et al, 2021 ; O’Connell et al, 2012 ; Steinemann et al, 2018 ). The level of beta before stimulus onset also predicts RT, and its post-stimulus buildup-rate scales with evidence strength, underlining that this signal reflects both evidence-independent and evidence-dependent contributions to the decision process ( Steinemann et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, before the onset of sensory evidence the ‘starting levels’ of the signals reflect biased motor preparation when prior expectations are biased ( de Lange et al, 2013 ), and are higher under speed pressure for both alternatives ( Kelly et al, 2021 ; Murphy et al, 2016 ; Steinemann et al, 2018 ), implementing the well-established decision variable (DV) adjustments assumed in models ( Bogacz et al, 2010 ; Hanks et al, 2014 ; Mulder et al, 2012 ). The signal contralateral to the chosen hand then reaches a highly similar level at response irrespective of stimulus conditions or RT, consistent with a fixed, action-triggering threshold ( Devine et al, 2019 ; Feuerriegel et al, 2021 ; Kelly et al, 2021 ; O’Connell et al, 2012 ; Steinemann et al, 2018 ). The level of beta before stimulus onset also predicts RT, and its post-stimulus buildup-rate scales with evidence strength, underlining that this signal reflects both evidence-independent and evidence-dependent contributions to the decision process ( Steinemann et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It is plausible that the LRP ‘bolus’ in our study could arise from a related mechanism in which the value cue automatically ‘primes’ a response, although it seems likely that value-biased responding is more intentional since it may confer a benefit in terms of the increased reward. Indeed, the patterns of biased anticipatory motor preparation we see in this study cannot be present in tasks where the conflict does not arise until after stimulus onset; in such tasks the anticipatory mu/beta buildup activity while present is unbiased ( Feuerriegel et al, 2021 ). In the case of these beta signals, the fact that the buildup happens earlier under speed pressure ( Kelly et al, 2021 ) suggests that they are much more likely to be strategic rather than automatic, and we would not expect a bottom-up lateralization in response to the physical appearance of the cues due to their symmetric design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En el diario vivir del ser humano se produce una constante adaptación de las estrategias que utiliza en el proceso de toma de decisiones con la finalidad de adecuarlas a las demandas del entorno, donde una de las principales áreas de investigación es la manera como se maneja la información durante un conflicto, particularmente en contextos en los que varias características de un estímulo se asocian con acciones motoras, según lo manifestado por los autores Feuerriegel et al (2021).…”
Section: Patrones Para La Toma De Decisionesunclassified
“…This widespread positive RT-BOLD relationship was found even in the case of fast and homogenous saccadic responses (Domagalik et al, 2014). Finally, numerous M/EEG indicators present similar tendencies for changing linearly with decision time, e.g., centroparietal positivity (O’Connell et al, 2012; Twomey et al, 2015), non-phase locked MFT (Cohen and Donner, 2013; Duprez et al, 2020; Feuerriegel et al, 2021), or motor beta and gamma frequency bands (Donner et al, 2009; Fischer et al, 2018; Rogge et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%