2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2007.4399174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking control for snake robot joints

Abstract: Abstract-This paper considers the problem of model based control of the joints of a snake robot without wheels. The potential range of applications for snake robots are numerous, and delicate operations such as inspection and maintenance in industrial environments or performing search and rescue operations require precise control of a snake robot joints. To this end we present a controller that asymptotically stabilizes the joints of the snake robot to a desired reference trajectory. The controller is based on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nilsson [9] employed energy arguments to analyse planar snake locomotion with isotropic friction. Transeth et al [10] proved that the translational and rotational velocity of a planar snake robot is bounded. Li et al [11] studied the controllability of the joint motion of a snake robot, but they did not consider the position and orientation of the robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nilsson [9] employed energy arguments to analyse planar snake locomotion with isotropic friction. Transeth et al [10] proved that the translational and rotational velocity of a planar snake robot is bounded. Li et al [11] studied the controllability of the joint motion of a snake robot, but they did not consider the position and orientation of the robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another benefit of employing these techniques is that many methods for accurately controlling robot manipulators now become available for snake robots. 109 However, a choice of minimal coordinates and a compliant contact force model renders the resulting set of equations of motion stiff and cumbersome to solve numerically. This is solved in parts by introducing nonminimal coordinates for a nonsmooth 3D model 110 where contact forces are modeled in a rigid-body setting and velocities are allowed to change instantaneously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that α and ω are still independent parameters since any choice of α and ω can be obtained by choosing k αω = α 2 ω. Using (5), (6), and (10), and introducing the velocity state vector v = (v t , v n , v θ ) ∈ R 3 , the velocity dynamics can be written asv…”
Section: A Model Of the Velocity Dynamics Of The Snake Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nilsson [5] employed energy arguments to analyse planar snake locomotion with isotropic friction. Transeth et al [6] proved that the velocity of a planar snake robot is bounded. Li et al [7] studied the controllability of the joint motion of a snake robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%