2019
DOI: 10.3233/jad-190631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking Cognitive Performance in the General Population and in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment with a Self-Applied Computerized Test (Brain on Track)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-three (94%) digital cognitive biomarkers from the test batteries showed good diagnostic performance with sensitivity and specificity higher than 75%, or AUC larger than 0.7. Several test batteries provided excellent diagnostic performance with AUC close to or larger than 0.9, including BHA [ 44 , 65 ], Brain on Track Self-applied Computerized Test (BoT) [ 66 ], and MoCA-CC [ 42 ]. Other single/multiple cognitive tests obtained a sensitivity range of 56.3–84.7%, a specificity range of 53.6–90.5%, and an AUC range of 0.67–0.91.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirty-three (94%) digital cognitive biomarkers from the test batteries showed good diagnostic performance with sensitivity and specificity higher than 75%, or AUC larger than 0.7. Several test batteries provided excellent diagnostic performance with AUC close to or larger than 0.9, including BHA [ 44 , 65 ], Brain on Track Self-applied Computerized Test (BoT) [ 66 ], and MoCA-CC [ 42 ]. Other single/multiple cognitive tests obtained a sensitivity range of 56.3–84.7%, a specificity range of 53.6–90.5%, and an AUC range of 0.67–0.91.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the test batteries achieved even better diagnostic performance, with sensitivity and specificity larger than 75%, and acceptable AUC larger than 0.8. For screening MCI, BoT [ 66 ] and MoCA-CC [ 42 ] were preferred test batteries. For screening dementia, CST [ 69 ], CCS [ 70 ], CANS-MCI [ 71 ], eSAGE [ 72 ], and Computerized Screening Test Battery [ 73 ] were preferred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the number of variations of standard tests is often limited resulting in practice effects [ 6 ]. Therefore, there is a clear need for a self-administered cognitive test that can be repeated periodically and is resistant to practice effects [ 7 ]. Such a test could be performed at home or in the clinic by using randomly selected non-repeating tasks to minimize practice effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies found that drawing time or drawing process can be a predictive factor for cognitive impairment [31,32]. In the last decade, some multidomain digital cognitive tests have been investigated, including Brain on Track [13] and Computerized Cognitive Screen [33]. These digital cognitive tests assess memory, attention, processing speed, and executive functions, and the administration time is around 20 to 25 minutes.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the calculation of the cutoff scores in paper-and-pencil cognitive tests cannot take behavioral data such as response time into account. Furthermore, "practice effects" occur with repeated applications, which could undermine the usefulness of the tests for measuring either the treatment response or the monitoring of disease progression [12,13]. In addition, older adults may not be motivated to seek out or undergo cognitive assessment with health care professionals, or they may have difficulties in accessing health care services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%