2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking area loss of China’s Nature Reserves from 2003 to 2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) Nature reserves are the areas with the most stringent protection [78], and their designation as spatial policy restriction conversion areas for future land use simulations is scientifically sound. However, due to the influence of resource extraction and development, the streamlining and downgrading of protected areas can lead to changes in the land types of nature reserves [79]. Determining the type of restricted area (e.g., those with ecological protection redline restriction, prohibited development zone restrictions, and permanent basic cultivated area restrictions) that can be more objectively used as a nonpermitted land conversion area to simulate future land types requires further research.…”
Section: Limitations and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Nature reserves are the areas with the most stringent protection [78], and their designation as spatial policy restriction conversion areas for future land use simulations is scientifically sound. However, due to the influence of resource extraction and development, the streamlining and downgrading of protected areas can lead to changes in the land types of nature reserves [79]. Determining the type of restricted area (e.g., those with ecological protection redline restriction, prohibited development zone restrictions, and permanent basic cultivated area restrictions) that can be more objectively used as a nonpermitted land conversion area to simulate future land types requires further research.…”
Section: Limitations and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forest ecology protection type (FEP) NNRs, such as Inner Mongolia Qingshan and Inner Mongolia Helan Mountain, had the highest effectiveness scores but some FEP NNRs also had the lowest effectiveness scores. The possible cause for this might be due to the well-known phenomenon of PA downsizing, degazettement, and downgrading (PADDD), where forest NRs were mostly downsized from 2003 to 2015 according to previous studies [62], which may have decreased management efforts. The desert ecology protection NNRs (DEP) had high effectiveness scores, possibly due to greening efforts, because our results showed that among all reserves, the DEP NNRs had statistically higher NDVI slopes than other types of NNRs (see Table 5).…”
Section: Effects Of National Nature Reserves On Grasslandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wildlife vegetation protection (WVP) NNR type has the lowest NDVI slope within the NNRs but still has a high NDVI cv value (see Tables 5 and 6), suggesting that the WVP NNR might be the most at-risk NNR with slow greening but high disturbance. As the "Green Shield" special action was carried out by the central government of China starting in 2017 [62], the high disturbance around the WVP NNR was found to possibly relate to the intensity of human activity, such as the large amount of development and construction present around the NNR [76]. Notably, Helianthemum songaricum, a living plant fossil, that is concentrated solely in the desert steppe in the West Ordos region of Inner Mongolia and the Yili Valley of Xinjiang Province [77,78], has been suffering habitat fragmentation due to disturbance from human activity [77].…”
Section: Necessity Regarding the Imar Nnr Effectiveness Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%