Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2008 Japan-China Joint Workshop on Frontier of Computer Science and Technology 2008
DOI: 10.1109/fcst.2008.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking and Repairing Damaged Databases Using Before Image Table

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [33], approaches were offered by the authors for data recovery that is maliciously attacked through the addition of Before-Image Tables (BI Tables). These BI Tables cannot be modified by any user at any time and have values of all deleted and updated data items.…”
Section: Data Integrity In Fog Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [33], approaches were offered by the authors for data recovery that is maliciously attacked through the addition of Before-Image Tables (BI Tables). These BI Tables cannot be modified by any user at any time and have values of all deleted and updated data items.…”
Section: Data Integrity In Fog Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Before Images approach was suggested in [17]. The Before Image table is a table that is similar to the stored table in the database but without constraints.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the mechanism of maintaining a transaction dependency graph in the executing period, the process for recovery could be quite efficient. A prototype system Phoenix based on this model was also developed using PostgreSQL DBMS [11][12][13][14][15] . However, the model depends on the mechanism of Multi-Version Concurrency Control (MVCC) of the PostgreSQL DBMS and could not be applied to common database systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%