2016
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2016.140851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Track-before-detect for sea clutter rejection: tests with real data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noticeably, in this kind of architecture the TBD operates directly on plot-lists, thus not requiring any discretization of the target state space as most of TBD methods. This allows a negligible complexity increase with respect to the conventional radar processing making the approach suitable for its application in practical systems [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noticeably, in this kind of architecture the TBD operates directly on plot-lists, thus not requiring any discretization of the target state space as most of TBD methods. This allows a negligible complexity increase with respect to the conventional radar processing making the approach suitable for its application in practical systems [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is mainly concerned with K-distribution, which is widely used in high-resolution radar detection systems. K-distribution [ 16 , 17 ] was derived from a paper by Eric Jakeman and Peter Pusey (1978) who used it to model microwave sea echo. It has been found to be a suitable model for heavy-tailed background in radar systems [ 18 ], since it provides an excellent agreement between theoretical and experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, when the detection performance is unsatisfactory, the tracking accuracy will decline. In this case, the track-before-detect (TBD) strategy [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] is proposed. It gets rid of the detection in any single frame, but accumulates the likelihood ratio of continuous multiple frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%