2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0218396x14500027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracing Three-Dimensional Acoustic Wavefronts in Inhomogeneous, Moving Media

Abstract: We present a numerical implementation of an alternative formulation of the geometrical, or ray, acoustics, where wavefronts rather than rays are the primary objects. Rays are recovered as a by-product of wavefront tracing. The alternative formulation of the geometrical acoustics is motivated, first, by the observation that wavefronts are often more stable than rays at long-range sound propagation, and, second, by a need for computationally efficient modeling of high-frequency acoustic fields in three-dimension… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WAM description of the atmosphere above southern Iceland, which is shown in figure 2(a), was previously used in modelling long-range propagation of atmospheric waves generated by the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull volcano (Matoza et al 2011;Zabotin et al 2014). Note that below about 250 km the effective buoyancy frequency N 0 , which enters the AGW dispersion relation (3.5), varies much more smoothly with height than the buoyancy frequency N (figure 2b).…”
Section: Derivation Based On the Wave Equation For Lagrangian Pressurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WAM description of the atmosphere above southern Iceland, which is shown in figure 2(a), was previously used in modelling long-range propagation of atmospheric waves generated by the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull volcano (Matoza et al 2011;Zabotin et al 2014). Note that below about 250 km the effective buoyancy frequency N 0 , which enters the AGW dispersion relation (3.5), varies much more smoothly with height than the buoyancy frequency N (figure 2b).…”
Section: Derivation Based On the Wave Equation For Lagrangian Pressurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ñ20mpÝ? (Ø?nØŠ †pdÅå(GBTµGaussian beam tracing)OŽ(J3^_6•• é'" º [25,26] Ú|^(Å5 O¿ ¿ þ [27] "º|éÅcÚ(‚; K•©z [7,8]®²‰Ñ ©Û §AO…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%