2024
DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracing the disc: The novel qualitative morphometric MRI based disc degeneration classification system

Zafer Soydan,
Emru Bayramoglu,
Devrim Ulas Urut
et al.

Abstract: BackgroundThis study aimed to develop a classification system for lumbar disc degeneration using routine magnetic resonance images (MRIs) that is easily applicable and unaffected by existing classifications' limitations, and to compare its reliability, reproducibility, and discriminative power to the widely used Pfirrmann classification.MethodsFive features were graded. This new classification system has eight grades, with at least one of these five features altering each grade. The T2‐weighted sagittal images… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human intervertebral disc tissues were selected from patients with varying degrees of degeneration (n = 6, Table I ) based on the Pfirrmann grading of MRI examinations. 27 The tissues were classified as mildly degenerated (MDD, Pfirrmann grading I and II) or severely degenerated (SDD, Pfirrmann grading III, IV, and V). The intervertebral discs in the MDD group were obtained from patients with congenital scoliosis, while those in the SDD group were obtained from patients with herniated discs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human intervertebral disc tissues were selected from patients with varying degrees of degeneration (n = 6, Table I ) based on the Pfirrmann grading of MRI examinations. 27 The tissues were classified as mildly degenerated (MDD, Pfirrmann grading I and II) or severely degenerated (SDD, Pfirrmann grading III, IV, and V). The intervertebral discs in the MDD group were obtained from patients with congenital scoliosis, while those in the SDD group were obtained from patients with herniated discs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%