Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3159652.3159677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracing Fake-News Footprints

Abstract: When a message, such as a piece of news, spreads in social networks, how can we classify it into categories of interests, such as genuine or fake news? Classication of social media content is a fundamental task for social media mining, and most existing methods regard it as a text categorization problem and mainly focus on using content features, such as words and hashtags. However, for many emerging applications like fake news and rumor detection, it is very challenging, if not impossible, to identify useful … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These kinds of studies focus on finding and tracking the spread of posts that include or link to misinformation, or model how misinformation examples spread and cluster across online communities without purposively sampling communities. Some make use of network structure information in social media platforms to observe how misinformation examples spread (Shao et al., 2018a, 2018b; Tambuscio et al., 2015; Vosoughi et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019), as well as how promotion of misinformation examples can become concentrated within certain communities (Surian et al., 2016; Schmidt et al., 2017; Wu and Liu, 2018). Studies that construct models of population-level outcomes using measures of information exposure or engagement are extremely rare – examples include models of cardiovascular mortality and vaccine coverage (Dunn et al., 2017; Eichstaedt et al., 2015).…”
Section: The Problem: Misinformation Studies Are Disconnected From Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These kinds of studies focus on finding and tracking the spread of posts that include or link to misinformation, or model how misinformation examples spread and cluster across online communities without purposively sampling communities. Some make use of network structure information in social media platforms to observe how misinformation examples spread (Shao et al., 2018a, 2018b; Tambuscio et al., 2015; Vosoughi et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019), as well as how promotion of misinformation examples can become concentrated within certain communities (Surian et al., 2016; Schmidt et al., 2017; Wu and Liu, 2018). Studies that construct models of population-level outcomes using measures of information exposure or engagement are extremely rare – examples include models of cardiovascular mortality and vaccine coverage (Dunn et al., 2017; Eichstaedt et al., 2015).…”
Section: The Problem: Misinformation Studies Are Disconnected From Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liang Wu and Huan Liu [7] States that the classification of messages was wont to find the messages spreading in social media which are not appropriate, trustworthy, etc. And proposed Trace Miner to classify messages in social media, with this an end-to-end LSTM-RNN's Classification model was also included.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al 16 proposed a kernel‐based method that compared the spreading of rumors to a tree structure to distinguish between different types of higher order rumors. Wu et al 17 utilized a long short‐term memory (LSTM) RNN that could classify and represent the propagation routes of a message. Ma et al 18 proposed a CNN with user‐attention‐based methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%