2009
DOI: 10.17348/era.7.0.247-270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracing Domestication and Cultivation of Bananas from Phytoliths: An update from Papua New Guinea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…have been used for identification to the genus level, although they are less readily differentiable to the species level than seed phytoliths (22)(23)(24). Here, discriminating morphological criteria of leaf and seed phytoliths are reexamined and augmented for reliable interspecific and intraspecific differentiation within Musa and between Musa and Ensete (Figs.…”
Section: Musa Genetics and Domestication Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have been used for identification to the genus level, although they are less readily differentiable to the species level than seed phytoliths (22)(23)(24). Here, discriminating morphological criteria of leaf and seed phytoliths are reexamined and augmented for reliable interspecific and intraspecific differentiation within Musa and between Musa and Ensete (Figs.…”
Section: Musa Genetics and Domestication Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact nature of the banana plants under cultivation is not known, but they are considered to include M. acuminata-types (Lentfer 2009) and thus specifically subspecies banksii, the only M. acuminata subspecies present on New Guinea. Despite the lack of specificity provided by the microfossil evidence in terms of domestication status, the Kuk evidence provides a broad temporal framework for understanding banana cultivation and domestication in the New Guinea region.…”
Section: The Generation Of Edible Aa In Isea-new Guineamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it shows that starch granule analysis has the promise of being another valuable tool for palaeobotanical analysis, complementary to other microfossil studies including raphides and phytoliths (Lentfer 2009b, Vrydaghs et al 2009). Therefore, while further development is necessary to clarify the diagnostic reliability of traits and levels of specificity, there is undoubtedly good potential for starch analysis to facilitate more robust interpretations of archaeobotanical assemblages and for tracking the history of banana dispersal and domestication, not only in Papua New Guinea, but throughout all the regions important to banana prehistory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%