2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracheostomy After Cardiac Operations: In-Hospital and Long-Term Survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

5
9
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is most likely due to a smaller sample size (VAD, n = 23, and cardiogenic shock, n = 33). Nevertheless, our findings of decreased survival with VAD and cardiogenic shock are supported by other studies showing that prolonged hemodynamic compromise, cardiac dysfunction, and vasopressor requirements are associated with increased mortality in the cardiac surgery and general ICU populations [2,12,23-26]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is most likely due to a smaller sample size (VAD, n = 23, and cardiogenic shock, n = 33). Nevertheless, our findings of decreased survival with VAD and cardiogenic shock are supported by other studies showing that prolonged hemodynamic compromise, cardiac dysfunction, and vasopressor requirements are associated with increased mortality in the cardiac surgery and general ICU populations [2,12,23-26]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Recent work described an opposite picture; only a minority, 1.04% to 4.13% of patients underwent a tracheostomy, mostly performed at the bedside in a percutaneous approach. 3,4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The overall survival rate is low in patients undergoing a tracheostomy after cardiac surgery. Walts et al 13 described a 1-year survival rate of 31%; Ballotta et al 2 described a 1-and 2-year survival rate of 29% and 31%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The possible predictors of early-and longterm survival in these patients are not yet well established. 3 Devarian et al 4 concluded that early tracheostomy after cardiac surgery was associated with reduced morbidity and mortality. This present report was the first research that defined the effect of tracheostomy timing on short-and long-term mortality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of sternal wound infection across all studies reported was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The percutaneous tracheostomy group had a sternal wound infection proportion of 3% (95% CI, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], and the open tracheostomy group had a sternal wound infection proportion of 9% (95% CI, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The incidence of sternal wound infection with early (<14 days) (7%; 95% CI, 3-11) versus late (14 days) (7%; 95% CI, 4-10) tracheostomy was similar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conclusions: The incidence of sternal wound infection after tracheostomy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains high at 7% (95% CI, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Open or percutaneous tracheostomy after cardiac surgery is a feasible option because the incidence of sternal wound infection and short-term mortality are comparable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%