2005
DOI: 10.2172/910998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracer Interpretation Using Temporal Moments on a Spreadsheet

Abstract: This report presents a method for interpreting geothermal tracer tests. The method is based on the first temporal moment (mean residence time) of the tracer in the subsurface. The individual steps required to interpret a tracer test are reviewed and discussed. And an example tracer test directs the user through the interpretation method. An Excel spreadsheet application of the interpretation method is a companion document to this report.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a Lorenz curve, the cumulative percent of a quantity (population in the original study of Lorenz, but here, storage capacity, which is the time-weighted reservoir volume seen by the tracer at time t) is typically plotted against the cumulative proportion of observations (originally wealth held by the percentages of the population, but here, the fraction of the tracer recovered in the production well through that volume, that is, flow capacity; Ayling et al, 2016;Hao et al, 2012;Lorenz, 1905;Shook, 2003;Shook & Forsmann, 2005;Shook & Suzuki, 2017). The primary assumptions for the analyses of flow and storage capacities are as follows: (i) fluid flow is at steady state and thus the swept pore volume and flow geometry do not vary with time and (ii) the tracers behave conservatively (Shook & Forsmann, 2005). Although the particulate 10.1029/2019WR025021…”
Section: Moment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a Lorenz curve, the cumulative percent of a quantity (population in the original study of Lorenz, but here, storage capacity, which is the time-weighted reservoir volume seen by the tracer at time t) is typically plotted against the cumulative proportion of observations (originally wealth held by the percentages of the population, but here, the fraction of the tracer recovered in the production well through that volume, that is, flow capacity; Ayling et al, 2016;Hao et al, 2012;Lorenz, 1905;Shook, 2003;Shook & Forsmann, 2005;Shook & Suzuki, 2017). The primary assumptions for the analyses of flow and storage capacities are as follows: (i) fluid flow is at steady state and thus the swept pore volume and flow geometry do not vary with time and (ii) the tracers behave conservatively (Shook & Forsmann, 2005). Although the particulate 10.1029/2019WR025021…”
Section: Moment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Similar to the approach of Shook and Forsmann (2005), the pore volume, V p [L 3 ], swept by the tracer, can be calculated as…”
Section: Moment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As curve tailings could not be resolved in the DRBTCs and also information on flow rates cannot be retrieved from GPR data only, established approaches for measured tracer transit time distributions such as moment analysis [51,52] cannot be applied for DRBTCs. However, if a sufficiently long time series would be available, relative moments, such as the Gini coefficient and the Peclet number, could be calculated from DRBTCs.…”
Section: Drbtc Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%