2012
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/23/12/125005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traceable size determination of nanoparticles, a comparison among European metrology institutes

Abstract: Within the European iMERA-Plus project 'Traceable Characterisation of Nanoparticles' various particle measurement procedures were developed and finally a measurement comparison for particle size was carried out among seven laboratories across six national metrology institutes. Seven high quality particle samples made from three different materials and having nominal sizes in the range from 10 to 200 nm were used. The participants applied five fundamentally different measurement methods, atomic force microscopy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
89
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For reference gold nanoparticles below 100 nm systematic deviations between the three sizing methods AFM, SMPS and TSEM were observed (see Figure 3). Similar deviations have been reported in the literature [6,7] and could not be resolved in the frame of the project. The JRP-Consortium therefore released the following recommendation on how to calibrate DMAs:…”
Section: Si-traceable Electric Mobility Diametersupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For reference gold nanoparticles below 100 nm systematic deviations between the three sizing methods AFM, SMPS and TSEM were observed (see Figure 3). Similar deviations have been reported in the literature [6,7] and could not be resolved in the frame of the project. The JRP-Consortium therefore released the following recommendation on how to calibrate DMAs:…”
Section: Si-traceable Electric Mobility Diametersupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The size distribution of nanoparticle production batches is regarded as the key determinant in understanding their properties (e.g. optical, electrical and catalytic) [7] and the ability to measure this with high accuracy and precision using electron [8,9] and scanning probe [10]microscopies is now well established. However, other factors will also strongly affect their behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of particle size, Duke 3100A ed by INRIM for their diameter n exercise [8] were employed. 97 ± 3 nm, a size distribution of dard deviation of 4.6%.…”
Section: Als and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%