2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.08.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace metals in sediments of two estuarine lagoons from Puerto Rico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
2
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
78
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1 (Nyékonakpoè) values suggest that the trace element may be entirely from crustal materials or natural weathering processes, while high EF values would indicate that a significant portion of trace element originates from non-crustal materials or non-natural weathering processes (Feng et al 2004). Here, the EF values were interpreted such as EF \ 1 indicates no enrichment, EF = 1-3 minor enrichment, 3-5 moderate, 5-10 moderately severe, 10-25 severe, 25-50 very severe, and [50 extremely severe (Acevedo-Figueroa et al 2006). …”
Section: Enrichment Factor (Ef) and Geoaccumulation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 (Nyékonakpoè) values suggest that the trace element may be entirely from crustal materials or natural weathering processes, while high EF values would indicate that a significant portion of trace element originates from non-crustal materials or non-natural weathering processes (Feng et al 2004). Here, the EF values were interpreted such as EF \ 1 indicates no enrichment, EF = 1-3 minor enrichment, 3-5 moderate, 5-10 moderately severe, 10-25 severe, 25-50 very severe, and [50 extremely severe (Acevedo-Figueroa et al 2006). …”
Section: Enrichment Factor (Ef) and Geoaccumulation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no predefined rule for the choice of the referring element if it has not to be locally and mainly representative of terrigenous sources [18]. [19] and [20] (tables 4 and 5). Beginning of the enrichment FE > 10 Source Anthropical A second criterion to evaluate the intensity of the metal pollution is the index of geo-accumulation (Müller, 1969).…”
Section: Laboratory Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the downstream WLFZ, higher EF values for As, Cd, Pb and Zn were found at X8 and X10; these higher values could be attributed to the chemical fertilizer application in the adjacent farmlands (Srinivasa Gowd et al 2010, Zhao 1996. As for Cr, Cu and Ni, the EF values were relatively lower, ranging from 1.1 to 1.6, both in the upstream and downstream WLFZs; therefore, these metals might come from crustal materials or natural weathering (Acevedo-Figueroa et al 2006). …”
Section: Enrichment Degree Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%