“…Secondary enrichments are known to occur, particularly in association with abrupt transitions in depositional conditions (e.g., marine versus nonmarine, normal marine versus euxinic marine). As a consequence of these environmental changes, sediments with very different properties are juxtaposed, and the resulting concentration gradients result in localized enrichments in iron sulfides and potentially Fe HR (Passier et al, 1996(Passier et al, , 1997Lyons et al, 2003;Cruse and Lyons, 2004;Jørgensen et al, 2004). Although a source of potential paleoenvironmental ambiguity, secondary effects are typically easily distinguished from primary euxinic deposition by their lack of lamination, highly localized mineralization, increased proportion of euhedral pyrite morphologies, and diagnostic d 34 S values, including highly 34 S-enriched samples (Middelburg, 1991;Middelburg et al, 1991;Sternbeck and Sohlenius, 1997;Wilkin and Arthur, 2001;Lyons et al, 2003;Jørgen-sen et al, 2004).…”