2010 International Conference on Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccceng.2010.5560386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace metal analysis of edible portion of Oreochromis nilotica in relation to growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, Ca and Mg concentrations did not affected by condition factor in wild E. vacha. Similar findings have also reported in wild catfish Mystus bleekeri [22] and in female Nile Tilapia [19]. Thus, these findings verify the results that condition factor stayed constant for the concentrations of Ca and Mg in the body of E. vacha.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, Ca and Mg concentrations did not affected by condition factor in wild E. vacha. Similar findings have also reported in wild catfish Mystus bleekeri [22] and in female Nile Tilapia [19]. Thus, these findings verify the results that condition factor stayed constant for the concentrations of Ca and Mg in the body of E. vacha.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Values of mean concentrations of studied metals (Table 1) in Eutropiicthys vacha represented the trend as, Calcium > Magnesium. The same trend was also reported by [18] in Oncorhynchus mykiss and [19] in Aristichthys nobilis. Results of this study are in agreement with report of [20], who had studied the effect of graded levels of dietary protein on elemental concentration of hybrid (Catla catla ♂ x Labeo rohita ♀) from Pakistan and reported that Ca concentration 992.05±48.94, 1015.89±31.43 and 1145.53±40.53 while Mg concentration 1145.53±40.53, 403.19±30.71 and 484.18±27.99 µg/g by feeding 15, 20 and 25% CP, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation