2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2005.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace Machines for Observing Continuous-Time Markov Chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as quantitative notions of equivalence relations are concerned, in the last 20 years several different semantics have been considered, as also witnessed in the context of QAPL, which in such a sense proposes interesting representatives of the lines of research in this field. Such studies include linear-time equivalences, like trace equivalence for continuous-time Markov chains [145] and for interactive Markov chains [146]; probabilistic barbed congruence [57], which coincides with observational equivalence for a version of CCS including a probabilistic guarded choice operator, branching bisimulation congruence for probabilistic transition systems obeying a general alternating model of probabilistic and nondeterministic states [11] and for a more general probabilistic transition system specification format [104], weak bisimulation for continuous-time Markov chains [23] and for Markov automata [6]; testing equivalence for reactive probabilistic processes [71] and for nondeterministic, probabilistic, and Markovian processes [22], reward-based testing preorders for probabilistic labeled transition systems [59]; finally, a spectrum of different probabilistic equivalences, including trace, bisimulation, and testing semantics, in the setting of nondeterministic and probabilistic processes [24], a generalized notion of bisimulation for state-to-function transition systems that is comparable to many other quantitative notions of bisimulation [103], and undecidability results of bisimulation on Petri nets under durational semantics [100].…”
Section: Information Flow Analysis and Equivalence Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as quantitative notions of equivalence relations are concerned, in the last 20 years several different semantics have been considered, as also witnessed in the context of QAPL, which in such a sense proposes interesting representatives of the lines of research in this field. Such studies include linear-time equivalences, like trace equivalence for continuous-time Markov chains [145] and for interactive Markov chains [146]; probabilistic barbed congruence [57], which coincides with observational equivalence for a version of CCS including a probabilistic guarded choice operator, branching bisimulation congruence for probabilistic transition systems obeying a general alternating model of probabilistic and nondeterministic states [11] and for a more general probabilistic transition system specification format [104], weak bisimulation for continuous-time Markov chains [23] and for Markov automata [6]; testing equivalence for reactive probabilistic processes [71] and for nondeterministic, probabilistic, and Markovian processes [22], reward-based testing preorders for probabilistic labeled transition systems [59]; finally, a spectrum of different probabilistic equivalences, including trace, bisimulation, and testing semantics, in the setting of nondeterministic and probabilistic processes [24], a generalized notion of bisimulation for state-to-function transition systems that is comparable to many other quantitative notions of bisimulation [103], and undecidability results of bisimulation on Petri nets under durational semantics [100].…”
Section: Information Flow Analysis and Equivalence Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we recall the non-deterministic, probabilistic and Markovian versions of trace equivalence, which were originally defined in Hoare (1985), Jou and Smolka (1990) and Wolf et al (2005). Instead, we consider directly the finite-length computations of the process terms taken in isolation, thus abstracting from the branching points of their behaviour.…”
Section: Trace Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markovian trace equivalence [8] considers two process terms to be equivalent whenever they are able to execute computations with the same functional and performance characteristics. It relies on comparing the process term probabilities of performing a computation within a given sequence of average amounts of time.…”
Section: Markovian Trace Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, Markovian testing equivalence [1] considers two models to be equivalent whenever an external observer interacting with them by means of tests is not able to distinguish between them from the functional or performance viewpoint. Finally, Markovian trace equivalence [8] considers two models to be equivalent whenever they are able to execute computations with the same functional and performance characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%