Trace and evaluation systems for health services quality in rural and remote areas: a systematic review

Li, Xiuxia; Wei, Lili; Shang, Wenru; Xing, Xin; Yin, Min; Ling, Juan; Mao, KuoRay; Zhu, Yiliang; Yang, Kang

doi:10.1007/s10389-017-0858-4

Cited by 14 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, we only searched WoS database and did not search other medical databases, since WoS is considered the most important database in scientometrics (11,17). Second, all data were extracted using scientometric tools, which differed from a systematic review or overview in which data were manually extracted by two or more reviewers (42)(43)(44); therefore, the data may be biased. With on-going development of the information science field and information visualization technology, we hope that these limitations will be solved by more advanced scientometric tools.…”

Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The global trends of migraine research from 2010 to 2019: a scientometric study

Li²,

Li³

et al. 2021

Ann Palliat Med

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the recent years, migraine has been widely studied by scholars from all over the world. This study aimed to use scientometric methods to identify research frontiers and development trends in the field of migraine research. We used the Web of Science (WoS) core collection database to collect articles and reviews related to migraine published from 2010 to 2019 on March 25, 2020. VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Excel were used for the scientometric analysis. A total of 6,357 publications (including 5,203 articles and 1,154 reviews) were identified. The United States published the most publications (n=2,151, 33.84%). Albert Einstein College of Medicine contributed the most publications (n=220, 3.46%). Cephalalgia was found to be the core journal with the most publications (n=766, impact factor 2019 =4.868) as well as the most co-citations (n=35,535). Lipton RB authored the most publications (n=159, 2.50%), while Silberstein SD received the most co-citations (n=4,215). The critical topics were causes and pathophysiological mechanisms, epidemiological characteristics, diagnostic criteria, treatment and prevention drugs, and migraine-related genes. Through the use of scientometric methods, this article has mapped the knowledge landscape of migraine research over the past decade. By showing the overall status of the field, it provides a useful reference for future research.

show abstract

Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The global trends of migraine research from 2010 to 2019: a scientometric study

Li²,

Li³

et al. 2021

Ann Palliat Med

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The information included in the study was extracted according to a predesigned data extraction table. The screening and information extraction of each paper were carried out independently by two professionals, and a third party was involved if there were differences of opinions 14,15 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The screening and information extraction of each paper were carried out independently by two professionals, and a third party was involved if there were differences of opinions. 14 , 15 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guideline for the treatment of no light perception eyes induced by mechanical ocular trauma

Yan

Yang

et al. 2022

J Evidence Based Medicine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Severe mechanical ocular trauma with no light perception (NLP) predicts a poor prognosis of visual acuity and enucleation of the eyeball. Since the innovative treatment concept of exploratory vitreoretinal surgery has developed and treatment technology has advanced, the outcomes of severe ocular trauma treatment in NLP patients have greatly improved. However, there remains a lack of unified standards for the determination, surgical indication, and timing of vitrectomy in NLP eye treatment. To address these problems, we aimed to create evidence‐based medical guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of mechanical ocular trauma with NLP. Sixteen relevant recommendations for mechanical ocular trauma with NLP were obtained, and a consensus was reached. Each recommendation was explained in detail to guide the treatment of mechanical ocular trauma associated with NLP.

show abstract

“…First, this systematic review analyzed the reporting quality of N-of-1 trials and protocols from 2015 to 2020 for the first time, which helps to improve the integrity and standardization 6 of the subsequent trials and the use of the protocols by all stakeholders. Like traditional systematic reviews, 26,27 we used a robust search of four common databases and data extraction procedures, including validation of the screening/sifting process and double data extraction. 16,28 Thus, the conclusions remain relatively impartial.…”

Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The reporting quality of N‐of‐1 trials and protocols still needs improvement

Wei

Chu

Han

et al. 2022

J Evidence Based Medicine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To evaluate the reporting quality of single‐patient (N‐of‐1) trials and protocols based on the CONSORT Extension for N‐of‐1 trials (CENT) statement and the standard protocol items: recommendations for interventional trials (SPIRIT) extension and elaboration for N‐of‐1 trials (SPENT) checklist to examine the factors that influenced reporting quality. Methods Four electronic databases were searched to identify N‐of‐1 trials and protocols from 2015 to 2020. Quality was assessed by two reviewers. We calculated the overall scores based on binary responses in which “Yes” was scored as 1 (if the item was fully reported), and “No” was scored as 0 (if the item was not clearly reported or not definitely stated). Results A total of 78 publications (55 N‐of‐1 trials and 23 protocols) were identified. The mean reporting score (SD) of the N‐of‐1 trials and protocols were 29.24 (0.89) and 29.61 (1.83), respectively. For the items related to outcomes, sample size, allocation concealment protocol, and informed consent materials, the reporting quality was low. Our results showed that the year of publication (t = ‐0.793, p = 0.872 for the trials and t = 1.352, p = 0.623 for the protocols) and the impact factor of the journal (t = 1.416, p = 0.619 for the trials and t = 0.359, p = 0.667 for the protocols) were not factors associated with better reporting quality. Conclusion With the publication of the CENT 2015 statement and the SPENT 2019 checklist, authors should adhere to the relevant reporting guidelines and improve the reporting quality of N‐of‐1 trials and protocols.

show abstract

Trace and evaluation systems for health services quality in rural and remote areas: a systematic review

Cited by 14 publications

References 14 publications

The global trends of migraine research from 2010 to 2019: a scientometric study

The global trends of migraine research from 2010 to 2019: a scientometric study

Guideline for the treatment of no light perception eyes induced by mechanical ocular trauma

The reporting quality of N‐of‐1 trials and protocols still needs improvement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About