1977
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.16.438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace and dilatation anomalies in gauge theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
417
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 469 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
12
417
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Including the respective contributions from the β-function allows one to compare the final expressions for the anomalous dimension of each operator. The anomalous dimension for O 62 is new and is the same as the one loop Yang-Mills β-function, [24,25].…”
Section: One Loop Renormalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including the respective contributions from the β-function allows one to compare the final expressions for the anomalous dimension of each operator. The anomalous dimension for O 62 is new and is the same as the one loop Yang-Mills β-function, [24,25].…”
Section: One Loop Renormalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current J(x) is the lowest-order version of the operator β(α)G 2 (x), which is renormalization-group invariant for chiral quarks [3,4]. As first noted in [5,6], the one-loop gluon condensate contribution to (1)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3). Modification of these one-loop results for a change of operator basis to β(α)G 2 from αG 2 (in the operator J and/or in the OPE) can be achieved by algebraic rearrangements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize, however, that there is abuse of notation in (29) since the field strength early eighties from lattice gauge theories [32,33,34]. The most recent value for the non-natural case of the pure SU(2) gauge theory is given by [36] O 4 ≈ 0.15 GeV 4 (30) and was calculated from field strength correlation functions (for a recent review of the method see e.g. [37]).…”
Section: Numerical Results For the Z(2) Vortex Induced Gluon Condensatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the function C ψ 0 (q 2 ) in (19) does depend on the state (see below and [29] for an illustration). This fact is just a reflection of the scale anomaly [30]. The other Wilson coefficient functions are defined in (18) without reference to a particular state.…”
Section: The Operator Product Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%