2019
DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trabecular micro‐bypass stent implantation with cataract extraction in pigmentary glaucoma

Abstract: Importance: Use of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with cataract surgery is well established to be safe and effective in primary open-angle glaucoma. This is the first study to exclusively evaluate use of the device in pigmentary glaucoma. Background: This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of a trabecular micro-bypass stent in combination with cataract surgery in pigmentary glaucoma. Design: Retrospective, consecutive case series. Participants: Twenty-four eyes of 12 patients with pigmentary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the safety and performance of iStent trabecular micro-bypass have been established by a breadth of studies evaluating the device, including in standalone implantation or in combination with cataract surgery or other MIGS procedures, in both single-and multiple-stent usage, in populations with various levels of disease severity, and in various subtypes of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The stent has been widely adopted and studied by surgeons around the world. 43 However, iStent outcomes have not been as closely examined in Japanese populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the safety and performance of iStent trabecular micro-bypass have been established by a breadth of studies evaluating the device, including in standalone implantation or in combination with cataract surgery or other MIGS procedures, in both single-and multiple-stent usage, in populations with various levels of disease severity, and in various subtypes of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The stent has been widely adopted and studied by surgeons around the world. 43 However, iStent outcomes have not been as closely examined in Japanese populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fechtner et al also reported incrementally higher OSDI scores in patients using more glaucoma medications, with mean OSDI scores of 12.9, 16.7, and 19.4 in eyes on one, two, and three glaucoma medications, respectively [9]. Alongside such studies correlating medications with ocular surface disease, the medication reductions consistently observed after stent implantation also are well known and widely documented [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Thus, it stands to reason that stent implantation would result in ocular surface improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1a) is a 12-item subjective questionnaire designed to assess a patient's symptoms related to chronic dry eye, its severity, and its impact on ability to function [32]. OSDI scores range from 0 to 100, with severity defined as normal (0-12), mild (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22), moderate (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), and severe (33-100). The Oxford Schema (Fig.…”
Section: Osd Testing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data from this present study comes from a single surgeon (J.P.B.) with extensive experience with the firstgeneration iStent device [7,28,29] ,which likely mitigated any early learning curve with the second-generation device. While it cannot be directly compared, the IOP-lowering results at 6 months in this present study are consistent or superior to what was reported with our experience in eyes with OAG with the first-generation device in combination with cataract surgery, which demonstrated a mean reduction of 3.7 mmHg at 6 months postoperative in the consistent cohort [30], compared to the 4.6 mmHg reduction noted in this study's consistent cohort.…”
Section: Safety Profilementioning
confidence: 99%